A Review of Mechanistic Models of Event Comprehension
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This review examines theoretical assumptions and computational models of event comprehension, tracing the evolution from discourse comprehension theories to contemporary event cognition frameworks. The review covers key discourse comprehension accounts, including Construction-Integration, Event Indexing, Causal Network, and Resonance models, highlighting their contributions to understanding cognitive processes in comprehension. I then discuss contemporary theoretical frameworks of event comprehension, including Event Segmentation Theory (Zacks et al., 2007), the Event Horizon Model (Radvansky & Zacks, 2014), and Hierarchical Generative Framework (Kuperberg, 2021), which emphasize prediction, causality, and multilevel representations in event understanding. Building on these theories, I evaluate five computational models of event comprehension: REPRISE (Butz et al., 2019), Structured Event Memory (SEM; Franklin et al., 2020), the Lu model (Lu et al., 2022), the Gumbsch model (Gumbsch et al., 2022), and the Elman and McRae model (2019). The analysis focuses on their approaches to hierarchical processing, prediction mechanisms, and representation learning. Key themes that emerge include the use of hierarchical structures as inductive biases, the importance of prediction in comprehension, and diverse strategies for learning event dynamics. The review identifies critical areas for future research, including the need for more sophisticated approaches to learning structured representations, integrating episodic memory mechanisms, and developing adaptive updating algorithms for working event models. By synthesizing insights from both theoretical frameworks and computational implementations, this review aims to advance our understanding of human event comprehension and guide future modeling efforts in cognitive science.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2024.
Builds on
12 of 67 references.
References · 12
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,428
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
- 2019Action Genome: Actions as Composition of Spatio-temporal Scene Graphscited by 249
- 2016Deep Predictive Coding Networks for Video Prediction and Unsupervised Learningcited by 203
- 2016Using Fast Weights to Attend to the Recent Pastcited by 161
- 2021Causal Influence Detection for Improving Efficiency in Reinforcement Learningcited by 70
- 2021Sparsely Changing Latent States for Prediction and Planning in Partially Observable Domainscited by 18
- 2018Learning, Planning, and Control in a Monolithic Neural Event Inference Architecturecited by 8
- 2018A neural network trained to predict future video frames mimics critical properties of biological neuronal responses and perceptioncited by 6
- 2016Basic Reasoning with Tensor Product Representationscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.