Individuation in Neural Models with and without Visual Grounding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We show differences between a language-and-vision model CLIP and two text-only models - FastText and SBERT - when it comes to the encoding of individuation information. We study latent representations that CLIP provides for substrates, granular aggregates, and various numbers of objects. We demonstrate that CLIP embeddings capture quantitative differences in individuation better than models trained on text-only data. Moreover, the individuation hierarchy we deduce from the CLIP embeddings agrees with the hierarchies proposed in linguistics and cognitive science.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2024.
Builds on
6 of 31 references.
References · 6
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
- 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 335
- 2021VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomenacited by 135
- 2019Multimodal Intelligence: Representation Learning, Information Fusion, and Applicationscited by 89
Built on by
Not cited yet.