WHOMP: Optimizing Randomized Controlled Trials via Wasserstein Homogeneity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate methods for partitioning datasets into subgroups that maximize diversity within each subgroup while minimizing dissimilarity across subgroups. We introduce a novel partitioning method called the textitWasserstein Homogeneity Partition (WHOMP), which optimally minimizes type I and type II errors that often result from imbalanced group splitting or partitioning, commonly referred to as accidental bias, in comparative and controlled trials. We conduct an analytical comparison of WHOMP against existing partitioning methods, such as random subsampling, covariate-adaptive randomization, rerandomization, and anti-clustering, demonstrating its advantages. Moreover, we characterize the optimal solutions to the WHOMP problem and reveal an inherent trade-off between the stability of subgroup means and variances among these solutions. Based on our theoretical insights, we design algorithms that not only obtain these optimal solutions but also equip practitioners with tools to select the desired trade-off. Finally, we validate the effectiveness of WHOMP through numerical experiments, highlighting its superiority over traditional methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2024.
Builds on
4 of 49 references.
References · 4
- 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 451
- 2020Fairness-aware Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 87
- 2019Balancing Covariates in Randomized Experiments with the Gram-Schmidt Walk Designcited by 13
- 2022Fair Data Representation for Machine Learning at the Pareto Frontiercited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.