Using dynamic loss weighting to boost improvements in forecast stability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rolling origin forecast instability refers to variability in forecasts for a specific period induced by updating the forecast when new data points become available. Recently, an extension to the N-BEATS model for univariate time series point forecasting was proposed to include forecast stability as an additional optimization objective, next to accuracy. It was shown that more stable forecasts can be obtained without harming accuracy by minimizing a composite loss function that contains both a forecast error and a forecast instability component, with a static hyperparameter to control the impact of stability. In this paper, we empirically investigate whether further improvements in stability can be obtained without compromising accuracy by applying dynamic loss weighting algorithms, which change the loss weights during training. We show that existing dynamic loss weighting methods can achieve this objective and provide insights into why this might be the case. Additionally, we propose an extension to the Random Weighting approach -- Task-Aware Random Weighting -- which also achieves this objective.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.
Builds on
17 of 37 references.
References · 17
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,345
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
- 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 816
- 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 809
- 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 791
- 2019N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecastingcited by 744
- 2018End-to-End Multi-Task Learning with Attentioncited by 533
- 2022Multi-Task Learning as a Bargaining Gamecited by 209
- 2021Reasonable Effectiveness of Random Weighting: A Litmus Test for Multi-Task Learningcited by 100
- 2018Adapting Auxiliary Losses Using Gradient Similaritycited by 98
5 more
- 2022Criteria for Classifying Forecasting Methodscited by 48
- 2020Forecasting: theory and practicecited by 36
- 2023Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Gamecited by 12
- 2023Sample-Level Weighting for Multi-Task Learning with Auxiliary Taskscited by 6
- 2023On Forecast Stabilitycited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Forking-Sequences: Statistically and Computationally Efficient Multi-Horizon Forecasting with Reduced Volatilitycited by 1
- 2026Accuracy-Preserving Stability Regularization for Large-Scale Retail Demand Forecastingcited by 1
- 2026Stabilizing distribution-free probabilistic forecastscited by 0
- 2026Downside-Controlled Online Forecast Combination under Delayed and Revised Outcomescited by 0
- 2026Downside-Controlled Online Forecast Combination under Delayed and Revised Outcomes24 Sep 2026
- 2026Accuracy-Preserving Stability Regularization for Large-Scale Retail Demand Forecasting14 Jul 2026
- 2026Stabilizing distribution-free probabilistic forecasts27 May 2026
- 2025Forking-Sequences: Statistically and Computationally Efficient Multi-Horizon Forecasting with Reduced Volatility6 Oct 2025