mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PCEvE: Part Contribution Evaluation Based Model Explanation for Human Figure Drawing Assessment and Beyond

arXiv 2409.18260 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For automatic human figure drawing (HFD) assessment tasks, such as diagnosing autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using HFD images, the clarity and explainability of a model decision are crucial. Existing pixel-level attribution-based explainable AI (XAI) approaches demand considerable effort from users to interpret the semantic information of a region in an image, which can be often time-consuming and impractical. To overcome this challenge, we propose a part contribution evaluation based model explanation (PCEvE) framework. On top of the part detection, we measure the Shapley Value of each individual part to evaluate the contribution to a model decision. Unlike existing attribution-based XAI approaches, the PCEvE provides a straightforward explanation of a model decision, i.e., a part contribution histogram. Furthermore, the PCEvE expands the scope of explanations beyond the conventional sample-level to include class-level and task-level insights, offering a richer, more comprehensive understanding of model behavior. We rigorously validate the PCEvE via extensive experiments on multiple HFD assessment datasets. Also, we sanity-check the proposed method with a set of controlled experiments. Additionally, we demonstrate the versatility and applicability of our method to other domains by applying it to a photo-realistic dataset, the Stanford Cars.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.

Builds on

20 of 39 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  7. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  8. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  9. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  10. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  11. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
  12. 2017Real Time Image Saliency for Black Box Classifierscited by 246
8 more
  1. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
  2. 2020Neuron Shapley: Discovering the Responsible Neuronscited by 98
  3. 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
  4. 2015Part-Stacked CNN for Fine-Grained Visual Categorizationcited by 61
  5. 2023FunnyBirds: A Synthetic Vision Dataset for a Part-Based Analysis of Explainable AI Methodscited by 49
  6. 2023LINe: Out-of-Distribution Detection by Leveraging Important Neuronscited by 34
  7. 2022Shap-CAM: Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks based on Shapley Valuecited by 23
  8. 2022ECLAD: Extracting Concepts with Local Aggregated Descriptorscited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.