mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FlowBench: A Large Scale Benchmark for Flow Simulation over Complex Geometries

arXiv 2409.18032 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2024physics.flu-dyn cs.LG cs.NEcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Simulating fluid flow around arbitrary shapes is key to solving various engineering problems. However, simulating flow physics across complex geometries remains numerically challenging and computationally resource-intensive, particularly when using conventional PDE solvers. Machine learning methods offer attractive opportunities to create fast and adaptable PDE solvers. However, benchmark datasets to measure the performance of such methods are scarce, especially for flow physics across complex geometries. We introduce FlowBench, a dataset for neural simulators with over 10K samples, which is currently larger than any publicly available flow physics dataset. FlowBench contains flow simulation data across complex geometries (textitparametric vs. non-parametric), spanning a range of flow conditions (textitReynolds number and Grashoff number), capturing a diverse array of flow phenomena (textitsteady vs. transient; forced vs. free convection), and for both 2D and 3D. FlowBench contains over 10K data samples, with each sample the outcome of a fully resolved, direct numerical simulation using a well-validated simulator framework designed for modeling transport phenomena in complex geometries. For each sample, we include velocity, pressure, and temperature field data at 3 different resolutions and several summary statistics features of engineering relevance (such as coefficients of lift and drag, and Nusselt numbers). %Additionally, we include masks and signed distance fields for each shape. We envision that FlowBench will enable evaluating the interplay between complex geometry, coupled flow phenomena, and data sufficiency on the performance of current, and future, neural PDE solvers. We enumerate several evaluation metrics to help rank order the performance of neural PDE solvers. We benchmark the performance of several baseline methods including FNO, CNO, WNO, and DeepONet.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.

Builds on

13 of 63 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2020WeatherBench: A benchmark dataset for data-driven weather forecastingcited by 272
  4. 2023Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEscited by 207
  5. 2022AirfRANS: High Fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics Dataset for Approximating Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutionscited by 77
  6. 2024Geom-DeepONet: A Point-cloud-based Deep Operator Network for Field Predictions on 3D Parameterized Geometriescited by 47
  7. 2023CFDBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Machine Learning Methods in Fluid Dynamicscited by 40
  8. 2019SkelNetOn 2019: Dataset and Challenge on Deep Learning for Geometric Shape Understandingcited by 10
  9. 2022An extensible Benchmarking Graph-Mesh dataset for studying Steady-State Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equationscited by 5
  10. 2020Industrial scale large eddy simulations (LES) with adaptive octree meshes using immersogeometric analysiscited by 2
  11. 2021Scalable adaptive PDE solvers in arbitrary domainscited by 2
  12. 2020The Second-Generation Shifted Boundary Method and Its Numerical Analysiscited by 1
1 more
  1. 2022Scalable adaptive algorithms for next-generation multiphase flow simulationscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 8; 2026: 9.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Walrus: A Cross-Domain Foundation Model for Continuum Dynamicscited by 26
  2. 2025Geometric Operator Learning with Optimal Transportcited by 15
  3. 2026RealPDEBench: A Benchmark for Complex Physical Systems with Real-World Datacited by 13
  4. 2024Geometry Matters: Benchmarking Scientific ML Approaches for Flow Prediction around Complex Geometriescited by 2
  5. 20253D Neural Operator-Based Flow Surrogates around 3D geometries: Signed Distance Functions and Derivative Constraintscited by 2
  6. 2025A Spectral-Grassmann Wasserstein metric for operator representations of dynamical systemscited by 2
  7. 2025Pre-Generating Multi-Difficulty PDE Data for Few-Shot Neural PDE Solverscited by 1
  8. 2026GenMed: A Pairwise Generative Reformulation of Medical Diagnostic Taskscited by 1
  9. 2026FLUIDSPLAT: Reconstructing Physical Fields from Sparse Sensors via Gaussian Primitivescited by 1
  10. 2025Improving Large Vision-Language Models' Understanding for Flow Field Datacited by 0
  11. 2025GeoFunFlow: Geometric Function Flow Matching for Inverse Operator Learning over Complex Geometriescited by 0
  12. 2025Predicting Time-Dependent Flow Over Complex Geometries Using Operator Networkscited by 0
6 more
  1. 2026WeirNet: A Large-Scale 3D CFD Benchmark for Geometric Surrogate Modeling of Piano Key Weirscited by 0
  2. 2026Do Neural Operators Forget Geometry? The Forgetting Hypothesis in Deep Operator Learningcited by 0
  3. 2026Breakeven complexity: A new perspective on neural partial differential equation solverscited by 0
  4. 2026ThousandWorlds: A benchmark for climate emulation of potentially habitable exoplanetscited by 0
  5. 2026Dandelion: A Spherical Flower for Neural Simulation of Planetary Dynamicscited by 0
  6. 2026FSAN: Flow State Attention Network for Aerodynamic Predictioncited by 0