mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RED QUEEN: Safeguarding Large Language Models against Concealed Multi-Turn Jailbreaking

arXiv 2409.17458 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2024cs.CR cs.CL cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid progress of Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened up new opportunities across various domains and applications; yet it also presents challenges related to potential misuse. To mitigate such risks, red teaming has been employed as a proactive security measure to probe language models for harmful outputs via jailbreak attacks. However, current jailbreak attack approaches are single-turn with explicit malicious queries that do not fully capture the complexity of real-world interactions. In reality, users can engage in multi-turn interactions with LLM-based chat assistants, allowing them to conceal their true intentions in a more covert manner. To bridge this gap, we, first, propose a new jailbreak approach, RED QUEEN ATTACK. This method constructs a multi-turn scenario, concealing the malicious intent under the guise of preventing harm. We craft 40 scenarios that vary in turns and select 14 harmful categories to generate 56k multi-turn attack data points. We conduct comprehensive experiments on the RED QUEEN ATTACK with four representative LLM families of different sizes. Our experiments reveal that all LLMs are vulnerable to RED QUEEN ATTACK, reaching 87.62% attack success rate on GPT-4o and 75.4% on Llama3-70B. Further analysis reveals that larger models are more susceptible to the RED QUEEN ATTACK, with multi-turn structures and concealment strategies contributing to its success. To prioritize safety, we introduce a straightforward mitigation strategy called RED QUEEN GUARD, which aligns LLMs to effectively counter adversarial attacks. This approach reduces the attack success rate to below 1% while maintaining the model's performance across standard benchmarks. Full implementation and dataset are publicly accessible at https://github.com/kriti-hippo/red_queen.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 39 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.

Builds on

39 of 70 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attacks2 Apr
  2. 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreaker6 Nov
  3. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries12 Oct
  4. 2023Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generation10 Oct
  5. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug
  6. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
  7. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?5 Jul
  8. 2023Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Study23 May

Other references · 31

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  6. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  7. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  8. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  9. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  10. 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,311
  11. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  12. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
19 more
  1. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
  2. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  3. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
  4. 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
  5. 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 462
  6. 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A surveycited by 414
  7. 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignmentcited by 283
  8. 2024SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusalcited by 224
  9. 2023Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignmentcited by 213
  10. 2023How FaR Are Large Language Models From Agents with Theory-of-Mind?cited by 75
  11. 2024Antidote: Post-fine-tuning Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuningcited by 71
  12. 2024ToMBench: Benchmarking Theory of Mind in Large Language Modelscited by 70
  13. 2018Evaluating Theory of Mind in Question Answeringcited by 64
  14. 2024Against The Achilles' Heel: A Survey on Red Teaming for Generative Modelscited by 55
  15. 2024CoSafe: Evaluating Large Language Model Safety in Multi-Turn Dialogue Coreferencecited by 51
  16. 2024Anchored Preference Optimization and Contrastive Revisions: Addressing Underspecification in Alignmentcited by 46
  17. 2024MARVEL: Multidimensional Abstraction and Reasoning through Visual Evaluation and Learningcited by 30
  18. 2024Exploring Perceptual Limitation of Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 24
  19. 2021IoT-Enabled Social Relationships Meet Artificial Social Intelligencecited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.