mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Copying style, Extracting value: Illustrators' Perception of AI Style Transfer and its Impact on Creative Labor

arXiv 2409.17410 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2024cs.HCcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative text-to-image models are disrupting the lives of creative professionals. Specifically, illustrators are threatened by models that claim to extract and reproduce their style. Yet, research on style transfer has rarely focused on their perspectives. We provided four illustrators with a model fine-tuned to their style and conducted semi-structured interviews about the model's successes, limitations, and potential uses. Evaluating their output, artists reported that style transfer successfully copies aesthetic fragments but is limited by content-style disentanglement and lacks the crucial emergent quality of their style. They also deemed the others' copies more successful. Understanding the results of style transfer as "boundary objects," we analyze how they can simultaneously be considered unsuccessful by artists and poised to replace their work by others. We connect our findings to critical HCI frameworks, demonstrating that style transfer, rather than merely a Creativity Support Tool, should also be understood as a supply chain optimization one.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

8 papers.