Minimal Variance Model Aggregation: A principled, non-intrusive, and versatile integration of black box models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Whether deterministic or stochastic, models can be viewed as functions designed to approximate a specific quantity of interest. We introduce Minimal Empirical Variance Aggregation (MEVA), a data-driven framework that integrates predictions from various models, enhancing overall accuracy by leveraging the individual strengths of each. This non-intrusive, model-agnostic approach treats the contributing models as black boxes and accommodates outputs from diverse methodologies, including machine learning algorithms and traditional numerical solvers. We advocate for a point-wise linear aggregation process and consider two methods for optimizing this aggregate: Minimal Error Aggregation (MEA), which minimizes the prediction error, and Minimal Variance Aggregation (MVA), which focuses on reducing variance. We prove a theorem showing that MVA can be more robustly estimated from data than MEA, making MEVA superior to Minimal Empirical Error Aggregation (MEEA). Unlike MEEA, which interpolates target values directly, MEVA formulates aggregation as an error estimation problem, which can be performed using any backbone learning paradigm. We demonstrate the versatility and effectiveness of our framework across various applications, including data science and partial differential equations, illustrating its ability to significantly enhance both robustness and accuracy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2024.
Builds on
9 of 36 references.
References · 9
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2021Solving and Learning Nonlinear PDEs with Gaussian Processescited by 128
- 2024Operator Learning: Algorithms and Analysiscited by 84
- 2019A Comparative Analysis of XGBoostcited by 80
- 2023Kernel Methods are Competitive for Operator Learningcited by 50
- 2016Nested Kriging predictions for datasets with large number of observationscited by 18
- 2023Codiscovering graphical structure and functional relationships within data: A Gaussian Process framework for connecting the dotscited by 8
- 2015On computability and disintegrationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.