Setting the AI Agenda -- Evidence from Sweden in the ChatGPT Era
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper examines the development of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) meta-debate in Sweden before and after the release of ChatGPT. From the perspective of agenda-setting theory, we propose that it is an elite outside of party politics that is leading the debate -- i.e. that the politicians are relatively silent when it comes to this rapid development. We also suggest that the debate has become more substantive and risk-oriented in recent years. To investigate this claim, we draw on an original dataset of elite-level documents from the early 2010s to the present, using op-eds published in a number of leading Swedish newspapers. By conducting a qualitative content analysis of these materials, our preliminary findings lend support to the expectation that an academic, rather than a political elite is steering the debate.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2024.
Builds on
10 of 33 references.
References · 10
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
- 2021Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 364
- 2023Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Modelscited by 226
- 2023The Generative AI Paradox: "What It Can Create, It May Not Understand"cited by 98
- 2023Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debatecited by 94
- 2023LLMaAA: Making Large Language Models as Active Annotatorscited by 79
- 2023The Effect of Scaling, Retrieval Augmentation and Form on the Factual Consistency of Language Modelscited by 11
- 2024Landscape of Generative AI in Global News: Topics, Sentiments, and Spatiotemporal Analysiscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.