Machine learning approaches for automatic defect detection in photovoltaic systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Solar photovoltaic (PV) modules are prone to damage during manufacturing, installation and operation which reduces their power conversion efficiency. This diminishes their positive environmental impact over the lifecycle. Continuous monitoring of PV modules during operation via unmanned aerial vehicles is essential to ensure that defective panels are promptly replaced or repaired to maintain high power conversion efficiencies. Computer vision provides an automatic, non-destructive and cost-effective tool for monitoring defects in large-scale PV plants. We review the current landscape of deep learning-based computer vision techniques used for detecting defects in solar modules. We compare and evaluate the existing approaches at different levels, namely the type of images used, data collection and processing method, deep learning architectures employed, and model interpretability. Most approaches use convolutional neural networks together with data augmentation or generative adversarial network-based techniques. We evaluate the deep learning approaches by performing interpretability analysis on classification tasks. This analysis reveals that the model focuses on the darker regions of the image to perform the classification. We find clear gaps in the existing approaches while also laying out the groundwork for mitigating these challenges when building new models. We conclude with the relevant research gaps that need to be addressed and approaches for progress in this field: integrating geometric deep learning with existing approaches for building more robust and reliable models, leveraging physics-based neural networks that combine domain expertise of physical laws to build more domain-aware deep learning models, and incorporating interpretability as a factor for building models that can be trusted. The review points towards a clear roadmap for making this technology commercially relevant.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2024.
Builds on
11 of 85 references.
References · 11
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,235
- 2016Harmonic Networks: Deep Translation and Rotation Equivariancecited by 295
- 2017Do Convolutional Neural Networks Learn Class Hierarchy?cited by 61
- 2018Automatic Classification of Defective Photovoltaic Module Cells in Electroluminescence Imagescited by 35
- 2023Physics-Informed Computer Vision: A Review and Perspectivescited by 28
- 2018Segmentation of Photovoltaic Module Cells in Uncalibrated Electroluminescence Imagescited by 9
- 2021Computer Vision Tool for Detection, Mapping and Fault Classification of PV Modules in Aerial IR Videoscited by 6
- 2022Studying the explanations for the automated prediction of bug and non-bug issues using LIME and SHAPcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.