mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LLM-Cure: LLM-based Competitor User Review Analysis for Feature Enhancement

arXiv 2409.15724 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2024cs.SE cs.AI cs.IRcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The exponential growth of the mobile app market underscores the importance of constant innovation and rapid response to user demands. As user satisfaction is paramount to the success of a mobile application (app), developers typically rely on user reviews, which represent user feedback that includes ratings and comments to identify areas for improvement. However, the sheer volume of user reviews poses challenges in manual analysis, necessitating automated approaches. Existing automated approaches either analyze only the target apps reviews, neglecting the comparison of similar features to competitors or fail to provide suggestions for feature enhancement. To address these gaps, we propose a Large Language Model (LLM)-based Competitive User Review Analysis for Feature Enhancement) (LLM-Cure), an approach powered by LLMs to automatically generate suggestion s for mobile app feature improvements. More specifically, LLM-Cure identifies and categorizes features within reviews by applying LLMs. When provided with a complaint in a user review, LLM-Cure curates highly rated (4 and 5 stars) reviews in competing apps related to the complaint and proposes potential improvements tailored to the target application. We evaluate LLM-Cure on 1,056,739 reviews of 70 popular Android apps. Our evaluation demonstrates that LLM-Cure significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches in assigning features to reviews by up to 13% in F1-score, up to 16% in recall and up to 11% in precision. Additionally, LLM-Cure demonstrates its capability to provide suggestions for resolving user complaints. We verify the suggestions using the release notes that reflect the changes of features in the target mobile app. LLM-Cure achieves a promising average of 73% of the implementation of the provided suggestions.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2024.

Builds on

15 of 63 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
  4. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 717
  5. 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 389
  6. 2023Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Checkcited by 262
  7. 2023Self-collaboration Code Generation via ChatGPTcited by 255
  8. 2024Automated Commit Message Generation with Large Language Models: An Empirical Study and Beyondcited by 10
  9. 2015Mining User Opinions in Mobile App Reviews: A Keyword-based Approachcited by 9
  10. 2023The Limits of ChatGPT in Extracting Aspect-Category-Opinion-Sentiment Quadruples: A Comparative Analysiscited by 6
  11. 2022Listening to Users' Voice: Automatic Summarization of Helpful App Reviewscited by 4
  12. 2017Fault in your stars: An Analysis of Android App Reviewscited by 3
3 more
  1. 2018The Impact of Annotation Guidelines and Annotated Data on Extracting App Features from App Reviewscited by 2
  2. 2022On the Importance of Performing App Analysis Within Peer Groupscited by 1
  3. 2023Unveiling Competition Dynamics in Mobile App Markets through User Reviewscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.