mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Ads that Talk Back: Implications and Perceptions of Injecting Personalized Advertising into LLM Chatbots

arXiv 2409.15436 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2024cs.HC cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled the creation of highly effective chatbots. However, the compute costs of widely deploying LLMs have raised questions about profitability. Companies have proposed exploring ad-based revenue streams for monetizing LLMs, which could serve as the new de facto platform for advertising. This paper investigates the implications of personalizing LLM advertisements to individual users via a between-subjects experiment with 179 participants. We developed a chatbot that embeds personalized product advertisements within LLM responses, inspired by similar forays by AI companies. The evaluation of our benchmarks showed that ad injection only slightly impacted LLM performance, particularly response desirability. Results revealed that participants struggled to detect ads, and even preferred LLM responses with hidden advertisements. Rather than clicking on our advertising disclosure, participants tried changing their advertising settings using natural language queries. We created an advertising dataset and an open-source LLM, Phi-4-Ads, fine-tuned to serve ads and flexibly adapt to user preferences.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2024.

Builds on

30 of 97 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  6. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  7. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  8. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  9. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  10. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  11. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  12. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
18 more
  1. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  3. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  4. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  5. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
  6. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  7. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
  8. 2022Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasonerscited by 518
  9. 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
  10. 2023AI Transparency in the Age of LLMs: A Human-Centered Research Roadmapcited by 119
  11. 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
  12. 2024"I'm Not Sure, But...": Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trustcited by 67
  13. 2024Linguistic Bias in ChatGPT: Language Models Reinforce Dialect Discriminationcited by 55
  14. 2016Display Advertising with Real-Time Bidding (RTB) and Behavioural Targetingcited by 42
  15. 2024A Synthetic Dataset for Personal Attribute Inferencecited by 35
  16. 2013Real-time Bidding for Online Advertising: Measurement and Analysiscited by 32
  17. 2019Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websitescited by 18
  18. 2024Laissez-Faire Harms: Algorithmic Biases in Generative Language Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.

7 papers.