mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Implicit Neural Representations for Speed-of-Sound Estimation in Ultrasound

arXiv 2409.14035 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2024cs.LG physics.med-phcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate estimation of the speed-of-sound (SoS) is important for ultrasound (US) image reconstruction techniques and tissue characterization. Various approaches have been proposed to calculate SoS, ranging from tomography-inspired algorithms like CUTE to convolutional networks, and more recently, physics-informed optimization frameworks based on differentiable beamforming. In this work, we utilize implicit neural representations (INRs) for SoS estimation in US. INRs are a type of neural network architecture that encodes continuous functions, such as images or physical quantities, through the weights of a network. Implicit networks may overcome the current limitations of SoS estimation techniques, which mainly arise from the use of non-adaptable and oversimplified physical models of tissue. Moreover, convolutional networks for SoS estimation, usually trained using simulated data, often fail when applied to real tissues due to out-of-distribution and data-shift issues. In contrast, implicit networks do not require extensive training datasets since each implicit network is optimized for an individual data case. This adaptability makes them suitable for processing US data collected from varied tissues and across different imaging protocols. We evaluated the proposed SoS estimation method based on INRs using data collected from a tissue-mimicking phantom containing four cylindrical inclusions, with SoS values ranging from 1480 m/s to 1600 m/s. The inclusions were immersed in a material with an SoS value of 1540 m/s. In experiments, the proposed method achieved strong performance, clearly demonstrating the usefulness of implicit networks for quantitative US applications.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2024.

Builds on

6 of 16 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  2. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
  3. 2023NISF: Neural Implicit Segmentation Functionscited by 29
  4. 2020Adversarial attacks on deep learning models for fatty liver disease classification by modification of ultrasound image reconstruction methodcited by 4
  5. 2023Investigating Pulse-Echo Sound Speed Estimation in Breast Ultrasound with Deep Learningcited by 4
  6. 2023Implicit neural representations for joint decomposition and registration of gene expression images in the marmoset braincited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.