mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robots that Learn to Safely Influence via Prediction-Informed Reach-Avoid Dynamic Games

arXiv 2409.12153 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2024cs.ROcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robots can influence people to accomplish their tasks more efficiently: autonomous cars can inch forward at an intersection to pass through, and tabletop manipulators can go for an object on the table first. However, a robot's ability to influence can also compromise the safety of nearby people if naively executed. In this work, we pose and solve a novel robust reach-avoid dynamic game which enables robots to be maximally influential, but only when a safety backup control exists. On the human side, we model the human's behavior as goal-driven but conditioned on the robot's plan, enabling us to capture influence. On the robot side, we solve the dynamic game in the joint physical and belief space, enabling the robot to reason about how its uncertainty in human behavior will evolve over time. We instantiate our method, called SLIDE (Safely Leveraging Influence in Dynamic Environments), in a high-dimensional (39-D) simulated human-robot collaborative manipulation task solved via offline game-theoretic reinforcement learning. We compare our approach to a robust baseline that treats the human as a worst-case adversary, a safety controller that does not explicitly reason about influence, and an energy-function-based safety shield. We find that SLIDE consistently enables the robot to leverage the influence it has on the human when it is safe to do so, ultimately allowing the robot to be less conservative while still ensuring a high safety rate during task execution.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Turning Safety into Competence: Minimally Exploitable Robot Policies via Safety-Filtered Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2024Robots that Suggest Safe Alternatives
  3. 2023Learning to Influence Human Behavior with Offline Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026How to Learn from What a Human Would Avoid? Intervention-Aware World Models with Real-World RL for Dexterous Manipulation
  5. 2025Safe Learning for Contact-Rich Robot Tasks: A Survey from Classical Learning-Based Methods to Safe Foundation Models
  6. 2026OHP-RL: Online Human Preference as Guidance in Reinforcement Learning for Robot Manipulation
  7. 2025RISE: Robust Imitation through Stochastic Encoding
  8. 2026Learning Safe Agent Behaviour from Human Preferences and Justifications via World Models