A Benchmark Dataset with Larger Context for Non-Factoid Question Answering over Islamic Text
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accessing and comprehending religious texts, particularly the Quran (the sacred scripture of Islam) and Ahadith (the corpus of the sayings or traditions of the Prophet Muhammad), in today's digital era necessitates efficient and accurate Question-Answering (QA) systems. Yet, the scarcity of QA systems tailored specifically to the detailed nature of inquiries about the Quranic Tafsir (explanation, interpretation, context of Quran for clarity) and Ahadith poses significant challenges. To address this gap, we introduce a comprehensive dataset meticulously crafted for QA purposes within the domain of Quranic Tafsir and Ahadith. This dataset comprises a robust collection of over 73,000 question-answer pairs, standing as the largest reported dataset in this specialized domain. Importantly, both questions and answers within the dataset are meticulously enriched with contextual information, serving as invaluable resources for training and evaluating tailored QA systems. However, while this paper highlights the dataset's contributions and establishes a benchmark for evaluating QA performance in the Quran and Ahadith domains, our subsequent human evaluation uncovered critical insights regarding the limitations of existing automatic evaluation techniques. The discrepancy between automatic evaluation metrics, such as ROUGE scores, and human assessments became apparent. The human evaluation indicated significant disparities: the model's verdict consistency with expert scholars ranged between 11% to 20%, while its contextual understanding spanned a broader spectrum of 50% to 90%. These findings underscore the necessity for evaluation techniques that capture the nuances and complexities inherent in understanding religious texts, surpassing the limitations of traditional automatic metrics.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2024.
Builds on
15 of 48 references.
References · 15
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
- 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
- 2023ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Toolscited by 273
- 2021LongT5: Efficient Text-To-Text Transformer for Long Sequencescited by 232
- 2021Hurdles to Progress in Long-form Question Answeringcited by 166
- 2019Span-based Joint Entity and Relation Extraction with Transformer Pre-trainingcited by 132
- 2023WebCPM: Interactive Web Search for Chinese Long-form Question Answeringcited by 93
- 2022Read before Generate! Faithful Long Form Question Answering with Machine Readingcited by 47
- 2022Query Refinement Prompts for Closed-Book Long-Form Question Answeringcited by 12
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Sacred or Synthetic? Evaluating LLM Reliability and Abstention for Religious Questionscited by 10
- 2025Assessing Large Language Models on Islamic Legal Reasoning: Evidence from Inheritance Law Evaluationcited by 10
- 2024Optimized Quran Passage Retrieval Using an Expanded QA Dataset and Fine-Tuned Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026SectEval: Evaluating the Latent Sectarian Preferences of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026SectEval: Evaluating the Latent Sectarian Preferences of Large Language Models13 Mar 2026
- 2025Assessing Large Language Models on Islamic Legal Reasoning: Evidence from Inheritance Law Evaluation1 Sep 2025
- 2025Sacred or Synthetic? Evaluating LLM Reliability and Abstention for Religious Questions4 Aug 2025
- 2024Optimized Quran Passage Retrieval Using an Expanded QA Dataset and Fine-Tuned Language Models16 Dec 2024