mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging Open-Source Large Language Models for Native Language Identification

arXiv 2409.09659 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Native Language Identification (NLI) - the task of identifying the native language (L1) of a person based on their writing in the second language (L2) - has applications in forensics, marketing, and second language acquisition. Historically, conventional machine learning approaches that heavily rely on extensive feature engineering have outperformed transformer-based language models on this task. Recently, closed-source generative large language models (LLMs), e.g., GPT-4, have demonstrated remarkable performance on NLI in a zero-shot setting, including promising results in open-set classification. However, closed-source LLMs have many disadvantages, such as high costs and undisclosed nature of training data. This study explores the potential of using open-source LLMs for NLI. Our results indicate that open-source LLMs do not reach the accuracy levels of closed-source LLMs when used out-of-the-box. However, when fine-tuned on labeled training data, open-source LLMs can achieve performance comparable to that of commercial LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2024.

Builds on

12 of 40 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  5. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
  6. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
  7. 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 224
  8. 2024Fine-Tuned 'Small' LLMs (Still) Significantly Outperform Zero-Shot Generative AI Models in Text Classificationcited by 66
  9. 2023The Gradient of Generative AI Release: Methods and Considerationscited by 63
  10. 2023On the Challenges of Using Black-Box APIs for Toxicity Evaluation in Researchcited by 44
  11. 2024Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough?cited by 39
  12. 2023Open, Closed, or Small Language Models for Text Classification?cited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.