Exploiting Supervised Poison Vulnerability to Strengthen Self-Supervised Defense
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Availability poisons exploit supervised learning (SL) algorithms by introducing class-related shortcut features in images such that models trained on poisoned data are useless for real-world datasets. Self-supervised learning (SSL), which utilizes augmentations to learn instance discrimination, is regarded as a strong defense against poisoned data. However, by extending the study of SSL across multiple poisons on the CIFAR-10 and ImageNet-100 datasets, we demonstrate that it often performs poorly, far below that of training on clean data. Leveraging the vulnerability of SL to poison attacks, we introduce adversarial training (AT) on SL to obfuscate poison features and guide robust feature learning for SSL. Our proposed defense, designated VESPR (Vulnerability Exploitation of Supervised Poisoning for Robust SSL), surpasses the performance of six previous defenses across seven popular availability poisons. VESPR displays superior performance over all previous defenses, boosting the minimum and average ImageNet-100 test accuracies of poisoned models by 16% and 9%, respectively. Through analysis and ablation studies, we elucidate the mechanisms by which VESPR learns robust class features.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 74 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2024.
Builds on
74 of 90 references.
References · 74
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
38 more
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
- 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
- 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
- 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 806
- 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 374
- 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 254
- 2021Unlearnable Examples: Making Personal Data Unexploitablecited by 188
- 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 162
- 2021On Feature Decorrelation in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 160
- 2020Adversarial Robustness: From Self-Supervised Pre-Training to Fine-Tuningcited by 152
- 2021Poisoning and Backdooring Contrastive Learningcited by 149
- 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144
- 2020Adversarial Self-Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 138
- 2020Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Lossescited by 129
- 2021Solo-learn: A Library of Self-supervised Methods for Visual Representation Learningcited by 116
- 2021Adversarial Examples Make Strong Poisonscited by 115
- 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
- 2021Gradient Descent on Two-layer Nets: Margin Maximization and Simplicity Biascited by 82
- 2021A Broad Study on the Transferability of Visual Representations with Contrastive Learningcited by 78
- 2021When Does Contrastive Learning Preserve Adversarial Robustness from Pretraining to Finetuning?cited by 76
- 2019Learning to Confuse: Generating Training Time Adversarial Data with Auto-Encodercited by 70
- 2022How Does SimSiam Avoid Collapse Without Negative Samples? A Unified Understanding with Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 65
- 2021Availability Attacks Create Shortcutscited by 60
- 2021Self-Supervised Learning Disentangled Group Representation as Featurecited by 47
- 2022Efficient and Effective Augmentation Strategy for Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
- 2022Understanding Collapse in Non-Contrastive Siamese Representation Learningcited by 42
- 2022Perfectly Balanced: Improving Transfer and Robustness of Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 40
- 2023Image Shortcut Squeezing: Countering Perturbative Availability Poisons with Compressioncited by 39
- 2023Mixed Autoencoder for Self-supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 38
50 most cited of 74 All 74 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025When and Where do Data Poisons Attack Textual Inversion?cited by 2
- 2025When and Where do Data Poisons Attack Textual Inversion?11 Jul 2025