Activation function optimization method: Learnable series linear units (LSLUs)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Effective activation functions introduce non-linear transformations, providing neural networks with stronger fitting capa-bilities, which help them better adapt to real data distributions. Huawei Noah's Lab believes that dynamic activation functions are more suitable than static activation functions for enhancing the non-linear capabilities of neural networks. Tsinghua University's related research also suggests using dynamically adjusted activation functions. Building on the ideas of using fine-tuned activation functions from Tsinghua University and Huawei Noah's Lab, we propose a series-based learnable ac-tivation function called LSLU (Learnable Series Linear Units). This method simplifies deep learning networks while im-proving accuracy. This method introduces learnable parameters θ and ω to control the activation function, adapting it to the current layer's training stage and improving the model's generalization. The principle is to increase non-linearity in each activation layer, boosting the network's overall non-linearity. We evaluate LSLU's performance on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and specific task datasets (e.g., Silkworm), validating its effectiveness. The convergence behavior of the learnable parameters θ and ω, as well as their effects on generalization, are analyzed. Our empirical results show that LSLU enhances the general-ization ability of the original model in various tasks while speeding up training. In VanillaNet training, parameter θ initially decreases, then increases before stabilizing, while ω shows an opposite trend. Ultimately, LSLU achieves a 3.17% accuracy improvement on CIFAR100 for VanillaNet (Table 3). Codes are available at https://github.com/vontran2021/Learnable-series-linear-units-LSLU.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2024.
Builds on
17 of 27 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,127
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
- 2017Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 935
- 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 703
- 2015Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Networkcited by 515
- 2016Benefits of depth in neural networkscited by 248
- 2015The Power of Depth for Feedforward Neural Networkscited by 181
- 2021Activation Functions in Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey and Benchmarkcited by 153
- 2018Activation Functions: Comparison of trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learningcited by 130
5 more
- 2017Continuously Differentiable Exponential Linear Unitscited by 73
- 2016Deep vs. shallow networks : An approximation theory perspectivecited by 63
- 2023VanillaNet: the Power of Minimalism in Deep Learningcited by 23
- 2024Three Decades of Activations: A Comprehensive Survey of 400 Activation Functions for Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2024A Method on Searching Better Activation Functionscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.