mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Low-Cost Tree Crown Dieback Estimation Using Deep Learning-Based Segmentation

arXiv 2409.08171 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The global increase in observed forest dieback, characterised by the death of tree foliage, heralds widespread decline in forest ecosystems. This degradation causes significant changes to ecosystem services and functions, including habitat provision and carbon sequestration, which can be difficult to detect using traditional monitoring techniques, highlighting the need for large-scale and high-frequency monitoring. Contemporary developments in the instruments and methods to gather and process data at large-scales mean this monitoring is now possible. In particular, the advancement of low-cost drone technology and deep learning on consumer-level hardware provide new opportunities. Here, we use an approach based on deep learning and vegetation indices to assess crown dieback from RGB aerial data without the need for expensive instrumentation such as LiDAR. We use an iterative approach to match crown footprints predicted by deep learning with field-based inventory data from a Mediterranean ecosystem exhibiting drought-induced dieback, and compare expert field-based crown dieback estimation with vegetation index-based estimates. We obtain high overall segmentation accuracy (mAP: 0.519) without the need for additional technical development of the underlying Mask R-CNN model, underscoring the potential of these approaches for non-expert use and proving their applicability to real-world conservation. We also find colour-coordinate based estimates of dieback correlate well with expert field-based estimation. Substituting ground truth for Mask R-CNN model predictions showed negligible impact on dieback estimates, indicating robustness. Our findings demonstrate the potential of automated data collection and processing, including the application of deep learning, to improve the coverage, speed and cost of forest dieback monitoring.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2024.

Builds on

9 of 67 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  4. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  5. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  6. 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 175
  7. 2023FOR-instance: a UAV laser scanning benchmark dataset for semantic and instance segmentation of individual treescited by 21
  8. 2022AI applications in forest monitoring need remote sensing benchmark datasetscited by 10
  9. 2020Deep Learning based Automated Forest Health Diagnosis from Aerial Imagescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.