Evaluation of Tropical Cyclone Track and Intensity Forecasts from Artificial Intelligence Weather Prediction (AIWP) Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In just the past few years multiple data-driven Artificial Intelligence Weather Prediction (AIWP) models have been developed, with new versions appearing almost monthly. Given this rapid development, the applicability of these models to operational forecasting has yet to be adequately explored and documented. To assess their utility for operational tropical cyclone (TC) forecasting, the NHC verification procedure is used to evaluate seven-day track and intensity predictions for northern hemisphere TCs from May-November 2023. Four open-source AIWP models are considered (FourCastNetv1, FourCastNetv2-small, GraphCast-operational and Pangu-Weather). The AIWP track forecast errors and detection rates are comparable to those from the best-performing operational forecast models. However, the AIWP intensity forecast errors are larger than those of even the simplest intensity forecasts based on climatology and persistence. The AIWP models almost always reduce the TC intensity, especially within the first 24 h of the forecast, resulting in a substantial low bias. The contribution of the AIWP models to the NHC model consensus was also evaluated. The consensus track errors are reduced by up to 11% at the longer time periods. The five-day NHC official track forecasts have improved by about 2% per year since 2001, so this represents more than a five-year gain in accuracy. Despite substantial negative intensity biases, the AIWP models have a neutral impact on the intensity consensus. These results show that the current formulation of the AIWP models have promise for operational TC track forecasts, but improved bias corrections or model reformulations will be needed for accurate intensity forecasts.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2024.
Builds on
2 of 24 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024Can AI weather models predict out-of-distribution gray swan tropical cyclones?cited by 26
- 2025Numerical models outperform AI weather forecasts of record-breaking extremescited by 14
- 2025Improving Medium Range Severe Weather Prediction through Transformer Post-processing of AI Weather Forecastscited by 1
- 2026Enhancing AI-Based Tropical Cyclone Track and Intensity Forecasting via Systematic Bias Correctioncited by 1
- 2025Data-driven global ocean model resolving ocean-atmosphere coupling dynamicscited by 0
- 20263DTCR: A Physics-Based Generative Framework for Vortex-Following 3D Reconstruction to Improve Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecastingcited by 0
- 2026AIFS-TC: A simple correction competitive with the operational frontier for tropical cyclone intensity forecastingcited by 0
- 2026AIFS-TC: A simple correction competitive with the operational frontier for tropical cyclone intensity forecasting24 Jul 2026
- 2026Enhancing AI-Based Tropical Cyclone Track and Intensity Forecasting via Systematic Bias Correction20 Mar 2026
- 20263DTCR: A Physics-Based Generative Framework for Vortex-Following 3D Reconstruction to Improve Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasting13 Mar 2026
- 2025Numerical models outperform AI weather forecasts of record-breaking extremes21 Aug 2025
- 2025Data-driven global ocean model resolving ocean-atmosphere coupling dynamics31 Jul 2025
- 2025Improving Medium Range Severe Weather Prediction through Transformer Post-processing of AI Weather Forecasts16 May 2025
- 2024Can AI weather models predict out-of-distribution gray swan tropical cyclones?19 Oct 2024