mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Human Perception of LLM-generated Text Content in Social Media Environments

arXiv 2409.06653 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2024cs.HCcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), and more specifically Large Language Models (LLMs) have provided malicious actors with powerful tools for manipulating digital discourse. LLMs have the potential to affect traditional forms of democratic engagements, such as voter choice, government surveys, or even online communication with regulators; since bots are capable of producing large quantities of credible text. To investigate the human perception of LLM-generated content, we recruited over 1,000 participants who then tried to differentiate bot from human posts in social media discussion threads. We found that humans perform poorly at identifying the true nature of user posts on social media. We also found patterns in how humans identify LLM-generated text content in social media discourse. Finally, we observed the Uncanny Valley effect in text dialogue in both user perception and identification. This indicates that despite humans being poor at the identification process, they can still sense discomfort when reading LLM-generated content.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

7 papers.