Understanding Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Healthcare Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness in AI-driven decision-making systems has become a critical concern, especially when these systems directly affect human lives. This paper explores the public's comprehension of fairness in healthcare recommendations. We conducted a survey where participants selected from four fairness metrics -- Demographic Parity, Equal Accuracy, Equalized Odds, and Positive Predictive Value -- across different healthcare scenarios to assess their understanding of these concepts. Our findings reveal that fairness is a complex and often misunderstood concept, with a generally low level of public understanding regarding fairness metrics in recommender systems. This study highlights the need for enhanced information and education on algorithmic fairness to support informed decision-making in using these systems. Furthermore, the results suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to fairness may be insufficient, pointing to the importance of context-sensitive designs in developing equitable AI systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2024.
Builds on
3 of 17 references.
References · 3
- 2022A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 102
- 2019Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 57
- 2018How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairnesscited by 48
Built on by
Not cited yet.