mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Healthcare Perspective

arXiv 2409.03893 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness in AI-driven decision-making systems has become a critical concern, especially when these systems directly affect human lives. This paper explores the public's comprehension of fairness in healthcare recommendations. We conducted a survey where participants selected from four fairness metrics -- Demographic Parity, Equal Accuracy, Equalized Odds, and Positive Predictive Value -- across different healthcare scenarios to assess their understanding of these concepts. Our findings reveal that fairness is a complex and often misunderstood concept, with a generally low level of public understanding regarding fairness metrics in recommender systems. This study highlights the need for enhanced information and education on algorithmic fairness to support informed decision-making in using these systems. Furthermore, the results suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to fairness may be insufficient, pointing to the importance of context-sensitive designs in developing equitable AI systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2024.

Builds on

3 of 17 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 102
  2. 2019Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 57
  3. 2018How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairnesscited by 48

Built on by

Not cited yet.