mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semi-Supervised Sparse Gaussian Classification: Provable Benefits of Unlabeled Data

arXiv 2409.03335 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The premise of semi-supervised learning (SSL) is that combining labeled and unlabeled data yields significantly more accurate models. Despite empirical successes, the theoretical understanding of SSL is still far from complete. In this work, we study SSL for high dimensional sparse Gaussian classification. To construct an accurate classifier a key task is feature selection, detecting the few variables that separate the two classes. % For this SSL setting, we analyze information theoretic lower bounds for accurate feature selection as well as computational lower bounds, assuming the low-degree likelihood hardness conjecture. % Our key contribution is the identification of a regime in the problem parameters (dimension, sparsity, number of labeled and unlabeled samples) where SSL is guaranteed to be advantageous for classification. Specifically, there is a regime where it is possible to construct in polynomial time an accurate SSL classifier. However, % any computationally efficient supervised or unsupervised learning schemes, that separately use only the labeled or unlabeled data would fail. Our work highlights the provable benefits of combining labeled and unlabeled data for {classification and} feature selection in high dimensions. We present simulations that complement our theoretical analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2024.

Builds on

14 of 38 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019Notes on Computational Hardness of Hypothesis Testing: Predictions using the Low-Degree Likelihood Ratiocited by 82
  2. 2019Subexponential-Time Algorithms for Sparse PCAcited by 41
  3. 2020Computational Barriers to Estimation from Low-Degree Polynomialscited by 38
  4. 2019An Introductory Guide to Fano's Inequality with Applications in Statistical Estimationcited by 30
  5. 2019Randomly initialized EM algorithm for two-component Gaussian mixture achieves near optimality in O(√n) iterationscited by 27
  6. 2013Sparse PCA via Covariance Thresholdingcited by 21
  7. 2014Influential Feature PCA for high dimensional clusteringcited by 13
  8. 2020Computationally efficient sparse clusteringcited by 12
  9. 2013Minimax Theory for High-dimensional Gaussian Mixtures with Sparse Mean Separationcited by 11
  10. 2013Do semidefinite relaxations solve sparse PCA up to the information limit?cited by 9
  11. 2019Learning Feature Sparse Principal Componentscited by 7
  12. 2014Detection and Feature Selection in Sparse Mixture Modelscited by 6
2 more
  1. 2018Curse of Heterogeneity: Computational Barriers in Sparse Mixture Models and Phase Retrievalcited by 6
  2. 2023Can semi-supervised learning use all the data effectively? A lower bound perspectivecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.