Understanding LLM Development Through Longitudinal Study: Insights from the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper conducts a longitudinal study over eleven months to address the limitations of prior research on the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard, which have relied on empirical studies with restricted observation periods of only five months. By extending the analysis duration, we aim to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the progression in developing Korean large language models (LLMs). Our study is guided by three primary research questions: (1) What are the specific challenges in improving LLM performance across diverse tasks on the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard over time? (2) How does model size impact task performance correlations across various benchmarks? (3) How have the patterns in leaderboard rankings shifted over time on the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard?. By analyzing 1,769 models over this period, our research offers a comprehensive examination of the ongoing advancements in LLMs and the evolving nature of evaluation frameworks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2024.
Builds on
6 of 12 references.
References · 6
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2023Holistic Evaluation of Text-To-Image Modelscited by 160
- 2024Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard: Evaluating Large Language Models in Korean with Ko-H5 Benchmarkcited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.