mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Q-Learning under Corrupted Rewards

arXiv 2409.03237 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, there has been a surge of interest in analyzing the non-asymptotic behavior of model-free reinforcement learning algorithms. However, the performance of such algorithms in non-ideal environments, such as in the presence of corrupted rewards, is poorly understood. Motivated by this gap, we investigate the robustness of the celebrated Q-learning algorithm to a strong-contamination attack model, where an adversary can arbitrarily perturb a small fraction of the observed rewards. We start by proving that such an attack can cause the vanilla Q-learning algorithm to incur arbitrarily large errors. We then develop a novel robust synchronous Q-learning algorithm that uses historical reward data to construct robust empirical Bellman operators at each time step. Finally, we prove a finite-time convergence rate for our algorithm that matches known state-of-the-art bounds (in the absence of attacks) up to a small inevitable O(varepsilon) error term that scales with the adversarial corruption fraction varepsilon. Notably, our results continue to hold even when the true reward distributions have infinite support, provided they admit bounded second moments.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2024.

Builds on

14 of 33 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 225
  2. 2019Finite-Time Error Bounds For Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learningcited by 165
  3. 2018Stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptionscited by 118
  4. 2020Finite-Time Analysis of Asynchronous Stochastic Approximation and Q-Learningcited by 93
  5. 2019Better Algorithms for Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 91
  6. 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 89
  7. 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 74
  8. 2020Stochastic Linear Bandits Robust to Adversarial Attackscited by 65
  9. 2018Adversarial Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 56
  10. 2019Data Poisoning Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 52
  11. 2018Q-learning with Nearest Neighborscited by 37
  12. 2020Corruption-Tolerant Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 34
2 more
  1. 2023Temporal Difference Learning with Compressed Updates: Error-Feedback meets Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  2. 2024Stochastic Approximation with Delayed Updates: Finite-Time Rates under Markovian Samplingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.