What Makes a Face Look like a Hat: Decoupling Low-level and High-level Visual Properties with Image Triplets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In visual decision making, high-level features, such as object categories, have a strong influence on choice. However, the impact of low-level features on behavior is less understood partly due to the high correlation between high- and low-level features in the stimuli presented (e.g., objects of the same category are more likely to share low-level features). To disentangle these effects, we propose a method that de-correlates low- and high-level visual properties in a novel set of stimuli. Our method uses two Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) as candidate models of the ventral visual stream: the CORnet-S that has high neural predictivity in high-level, IT-like responses and the VGG-16 that has high neural predictivity in low-level responses. Triplets (root, image1, image2) of stimuli are parametrized by the level of low- and high-level similarity of images extracted from the different layers. These stimuli are then used in a decision-making task where participants are tasked to choose the most similar-to-the-root image. We found that different networks show differing abilities to predict the effects of low-versus-high-level similarity: while CORnet-S outperforms VGG-16 in explaining human choices based on high-level similarity, VGG-16 outperforms CORnet-S in explaining human choices based on low-level similarity. Using Brain-Score, we observed that the behavioral prediction abilities of different layers of these networks qualitatively corresponded to their ability to explain neural activity at different levels of the visual hierarchy. In summary, our algorithm for stimulus set generation enables the study of how different representations in the visual stream affect high-level cognitive behaviors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2024.
Builds on
5 of 24 references.
References · 5
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2019Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNscited by 90
- 2024Vision-LSTM: xLSTM as Generic Vision Backbonecited by 51
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning Models Predict Visual Responses in the Brain: A Preliminary Resultcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.