Political DEBATE: Efficient Zero-shot and Few-shot Classifiers for Political Text
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Social scientists quickly adopted large language models due to their ability to annotate documents without supervised training, an ability known as zero-shot learning. However, due to their compute demands, cost, and often proprietary nature, these models are often at odds with replication and open science standards. This paper introduces the Political DEBATE (DeBERTa Algorithm for Textual Entailment) language models for zero-shot and few-shot classification of political documents. These models are not only as good, or better than, state-of-the art large language models at zero and few-shot classification, but are orders of magnitude more efficient and completely open source. By training the models on a simple random sample of 10-25 documents, they can outperform supervised classifiers trained on hundreds or thousands of documents and state-of-the-art generative models with complex, engineered prompts. Additionally, we release the PolNLI dataset used to train these models -- a corpus of over 200,000 political documents with highly accurate labels across over 800 classification tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2024.
Builds on
23 of 50 references.
References · 23
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,219
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
- 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 526
- 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 506
- 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 358
11 more
- 2023Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?cited by 245
- 2020Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 140
- 2020Measuring a hate speech spectrum with faceted Rasch item response theory and perspective-aware, explainable-by-design deep learningcited by 67
- 2019A Large-scale Dataset for Argument Quality Ranking: Construction and Analysiscited by 66
- 2020Detecting Stance in Media on Global Warmingcited by 48
- 2023Stance Detection: A Practical Guide to Classifying Political Beliefs in Textcited by 20
- 2021Corpus-Level Evaluation for Event QA: The IndiaPoliceEvents Corpus Covering the 2002 Gujarat Violencecited by 19
- 2023Building Efficient Universal Classifiers with Natural Language Inferencecited by 19
- 2024Benchmarking the Capabilities of Large Language Models in Transportation System Engineering: Accuracy, Consistency, and Reasoning Behaviorscited by 13
- 2023Towards Coding Social Science Datasets with Language Modelscited by 10
- 2022Rethinking the Event Coding Pipeline with Prompt Entailmentcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2025Generative Exaggeration in LLM Social Agents: Consistency, Bias, and Toxicitycited by 8
- 2025Mitigating Bias in RAG: Controlling the Embeddercited by 6
- 2025Op-Fed: Opinion, Stance, and Monetary Policy Annotations on FOMC Transcripts Using Active Learningcited by 1
- 2024Red and blue language: Word choices in the Trump & Harris 2024 presidential debatecited by 0
- 2025Political Leaning and Politicalness Classification of Textscited by 0
- 2025LLM Analysis of 150+ years of German Parliamentary Debates on Migration Reveals Shift from Post-War Solidarity to Anti-Solidarity in the Last Decadecited by 0
- 2026Blaming Across the Aisle: Political Contrasting and Blame Attribution in the Danish Parliamentcited by 0
- 2026Blaming Across the Aisle: Political Contrasting and Blame Attribution in the Danish Parliament22 Sep 2026
- 2025Op-Fed: Opinion, Stance, and Monetary Policy Annotations on FOMC Transcripts Using Active Learning16 Sep 2025
- 2025LLM Analysis of 150+ years of German Parliamentary Debates on Migration Reveals Shift from Post-War Solidarity to Anti-Solidarity in the Last Decade8 Sep 2025
- 2025Political Leaning and Politicalness Classification of Texts18 Jul 2025
- 2025Generative Exaggeration in LLM Social Agents: Consistency, Bias, and Toxicity1 Jul 2025
- 2025Mitigating Bias in RAG: Controlling the Embedder24 Feb 2025
- 2024Red and blue language: Word choices in the Trump & Harris 2024 presidential debate17 Oct 2024