mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Task-Specific Directions: Definition, Exploration, and Utilization in Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2409.01035 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2024cs.CL cs.CV cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models demonstrate impressive performance on downstream tasks, yet they require extensive resource consumption when fully fine-tuning all parameters. To mitigate this, Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) strategies, such as LoRA, have been developed. In this paper, we delve into the concept of task-specific directions (TSDs), which are critical for transitioning large models from pretrained states to task-specific enhancements in PEFT. We propose a framework to clearly define these directions and explore their properties and practical utilization challenges. We then introduce a novel approach, LoRA-Dash, which aims to maximize the impact of TSDs during the fine-tuning process, thereby enhancing model performance on targeted tasks. Additionally, based on our exploration of TSD, we focus on an important issue in PEFT: the initialization of LoRA. While some works have pointed out the significance of initialization for LoRA's performance and proposed various strategies, these methods are often empirical and not task-specific. To address this issue, we propose LoRA-Init. Starting from TSD, we identify the directions that require the most adjustment during fine-tuning for downstream tasks. By initializing the matrices in LoRA with these directions, LoRA-Init significantly enhances LoRA's performance. Moreover, we can combine LoRA-Dash and LoRA-Init to create the final version of LoRA based on TSDs, which we refer to as LoRA-TSD. Extensive experiments have conclusively demonstrated the effectiveness of these methods, and in-depth analyses further reveal the underlying mechanisms behind their success.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2024.

Builds on

66 of 94 references.

References · 66

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  5. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  6. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  7. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  8. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  9. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  10. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  11. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  12. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
38 more
  1. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  2. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  3. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
  4. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  6. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  7. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  8. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  9. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  10. 2022DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generationcited by 3,286
  11. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  12. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  13. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  14. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  15. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  16. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
  17. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
  18. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  19. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
  20. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
  21. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,219
  22. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
  23. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
  24. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
  25. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 863
  26. 2018VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind Peoplecited by 852
  27. 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 780
  28. 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 740
  29. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 714
  30. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 676
  31. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
  32. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
  33. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
  34. 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 458
  35. 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 364
  36. 2023LLM-Adapters: An Adapter Family for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 317
  37. 2023VeRA: Vector-based Random Matrix Adaptationcited by 294
  38. 2021Parameter-efficient Multi-task Fine-tuning for Transformers via Shared Hypernetworkscited by 278

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.