mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unveiling the Vulnerability of Private Fine-Tuning in Split-Based Frameworks for Large Language Models: A Bidirectionally Enhanced Attack

arXiv 2409.00960 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2024cs.CRcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have significantly influenced various domains. Adapting these models for specific tasks often involves fine-tuning (FT) with private, domain-specific data. However, privacy concerns keep this data undisclosed, and the computational demands for deploying LLMs pose challenges for resource-limited data holders. This has sparked interest in split learning (SL), a Model-as-a-Service (MaaS) paradigm that divides LLMs into smaller segments for distributed training and deployment, transmitting only intermediate activations instead of raw data. SL has garnered substantial interest in both industry and academia as it aims to balance user data privacy, model ownership, and resource challenges in the private fine-tuning of LLMs. Despite its privacy claims, this paper reveals significant vulnerabilities arising from the combination of SL and LLM-FT: the Not-too-far property of fine-tuning and the auto-regressive nature of LLMs. Exploiting these vulnerabilities, we propose Bidirectional Semi-white-box Reconstruction (BiSR), the first data reconstruction attack (DRA) designed to target both the forward and backward propagation processes of SL. BiSR utilizes pre-trained weights as prior knowledge, combining a learning-based attack with a bidirectional optimization-based approach for highly effective data reconstruction. Additionally, it incorporates a Noise-adaptive Mixture of Experts (NaMoE) model to enhance reconstruction performance under perturbation. We conducted systematic experiments on various mainstream LLMs and different setups, empirically demonstrating BiSR's state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, we thoroughly examined three representative defense mechanisms, showcasing our method's capability to reconstruct private data even in the presence of these defenses.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 12.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Depth Gives a False Sense of Privacy: LLM Internal States Inversioncited by 17
  2. 2024CENTAUR: Bridging the Impossible Trinity of Privacy, Efficiency, and Performance in Privacy-Preserving Transformer Inferencecited by 6
  3. 2025VFLAIR-LLM: A Comprehensive Framework and Benchmark for Split Learning of LLMscited by 5
  4. 2026Confundo: Learning to Generate Robust Poison for Practical RAG Systemscited by 5
  5. 2025Unveiling the Landscape of LLM Deployment in the Wild: An Empirical Studycited by 4
  6. 2026What Does the Server See? Understanding Privacy Leakage from Large Language Models in Split Inferencecited by 4
  7. 2026From Prompts to Responses: Dual-Sided Data Leakage and Defense in Split Large Language Modelscited by 2
  8. 2026NOIR: Privacy-Preserving Generation of Code with Open-Source LLMscited by 1
  9. 2026The Art of Mixology: Mixup-based Obfuscation for Privacy-Preserving Split Learning in Large Language Modelscited by 1
  10. 2026Privacy Failure in Split-LLM Training, The Returned Gradient Nullifies the Decoyscited by 1
  11. 2026Privacy-Preserving Split Learning for Federated LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 1
  12. 2025Navigating the Designs of Privacy-Preserving Fine-tuning for Large Language Modelscited by 0
6 more
  1. 2025InfoDecom: Decomposing Information for Defending Against Privacy Leakage in Split Inferencecited by 0
  2. 2026FedGRPO: Privately Optimizing Foundation Models with Group-Relative Rewards from Domain Clientcited by 0
  3. 2026Gradient Mirage: Trainable yet Label-Unidentifiable Gradients in Large Language Model Split Learningcited by 0
  4. 2026Unveiling the Depth-Performance Dilemma in Split-Federated Fine-tuning of LLMscited by 0
  5. 2026The Safeguard Worked. Is the LLM System Safer?cited by 0
  6. 2026What Gradients Add to Text Leakage in Split Language Models, Counted per Token and per Documentcited by 0