mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Federated Aggregation of Mallows Rankings: A Comparative Analysis of Borda and Lehmer Coding

arXiv 2409.00848 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.DCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rank aggregation combines multiple ranked lists into a consensus ranking. In fields like biomedical data sharing, rankings may be distributed and require privacy. This motivates the need for federated rank aggregation protocols, which support distributed, private, and communication-efficient learning across multiple clients with local data. We present the first known federated rank aggregation methods using Borda scoring and Lehmer codes, focusing on the sample complexity for federated algorithms on Mallows distributions with a known scaling factor φ and an unknown centroid permutation σ0. Federated Borda approach involves local client scoring, nontrivial quantization, and privacy-preserving protocols. We show that for φ ∈ [0,1), and arbitrary σ0 of length N, it suffices for each of the L clients to locally aggregate maxC1(φ), C2(φ)frac1Llog fracNδ rankings, where C1(φ) and C2(φ) are constants, quantize the result, and send it to the server who can then recover σ0 with probability ≥ 1-δ. Communication complexity scales as NL log N. Our results represent the first rigorous analysis of Borda's method in centralized and distributed settings under the Mallows model. Federated Lehmer coding approach creates a local Lehmer code for each client, using a coordinate-majority aggregation approach with specialized quantization methods for efficiency and privacy. We show that for φ+φ2<1+φN, and arbitrary σ0 of length N, it suffices for each of the L clients to locally aggregate maxC3(φ), C4(φ)frac1Llog fracNδ rankings, where C3(φ) and C4(φ) are constants. Clients send truncated Lehmer coordinate histograms to the server, which can recover σ0 with probability ≥ 1-δ. Communication complexity is ~ O(Nlog NLlog L).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2024.

Builds on

11 of 50 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  2. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  3. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
  4. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 558
  5. 2019Optimal Learning of Mallows Block Modelcited by 12
  6. 2020Concentric mixtures of Mallows models for top-k rankings: sampling and identifiabilitycited by 8
  7. 2021FRL: Federated Rank Learningcited by 8
  8. 2023Fair Rank Aggregationcited by 5
  9. 2021Private Rank Aggregation in Central and Local Modelscited by 4
  10. 2022On A Mallows-type Model For (Ranked) Choicescited by 4
  11. 2017Efficient Rank Aggregation via Lehmer Codescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.