DiverseDialogue: A Methodology for Designing Chatbots with Human-Like Diversity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs), which simulate human users, are frequently employed to evaluate chatbots in applications such as tutoring and customer service. Effective evaluation necessitates a high degree of human-like diversity within these simulations. In this paper, we demonstrate that conversations generated by GPT-4o mini, when used as simulated human participants, systematically differ from those between actual humans across multiple linguistic features. These features include topic variation, lexical attributes, and both the average behavior and diversity (variance) of the language used. To address these discrepancies, we propose an approach that automatically generates prompts for user simulations by incorporating features derived from real human interactions, such as age, gender, emotional tone, and the topics discussed. We assess our approach using differential language analysis combined with deep linguistic inquiry. Our method of prompt optimization, tailored to target specific linguistic features, shows significant improvements. Specifically, it enhances the human-likeness of LLM chatbot conversations, increasing their linguistic diversity. On average, we observe a 54 percent reduction in the error of average features between human and LLM-generated conversations. This method of constructing chatbot sets with human-like diversity holds great potential for enhancing the evaluation process of user-facing bots.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2024.
Builds on
12 of 26 references.
References · 12
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
- 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 506
- 2024Agent Hospital: A Simulacrum of Hospital with Evolvable Medical Agentscited by 210
- 2023Can Large Language Models Serve as Rational Players in Game Theory? A Systematic Analysiscited by 91
- 2024PersonaGym: Evaluating Persona Agents and LLMscited by 89
- 2024From Distributional to Overton Pluralism: Investigating Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 33
- 2020Spot The Bot: A Robust and Efficient Framework for the Evaluation of Conversational Dialogue Systemscited by 26
- 2023CycleAlign: Iterative Distillation from Black-box LLM to White-box Models for Better Human Alignmentcited by 13
- 2022Advancing an Interdisciplinary Science of Conversation: Insights from a Large Multimodal Corpus of Human Speechcited by 3
- 2024Vernacular? I Barely Know Her: Challenges with Style Control and Stereotypingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Towards a Design Guideline for RPA Evaluation: A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Role-Playing Agentscited by 22
- 2025LLM-Based Social Simulations Require a Boundarycited by 11
- 2025MEDAL: A Framework for Benchmarking LLMs as Multilingual Open-Domain Dialogue Evaluatorscited by 1
- 2026Ask or Answer: A Decision Framework for Multi-Turn Health Misinformation Interventioncited by 0
- 2026Ask or Answer: A Decision Framework for Multi-Turn Health Misinformation Intervention22 Aug 2026
- 2025LLM-Based Social Simulations Require a Boundary24 Jun 2025
- 2025MEDAL: A Framework for Benchmarking LLMs as Multilingual Open-Domain Dialogue Evaluators28 May 2025
- 2025Towards a Design Guideline for RPA Evaluation: A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Role-Playing Agents18 Feb 2025