Pre-Training Multimodal Hallucination Detectors with Corrupted Grounding Data
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal language models can exhibit hallucinations in their outputs, which limits their reliability. The ability to automatically detect these errors is important for mitigating them, but has been less explored and existing efforts do not localize hallucinations, instead framing this as a classification task. In this work, we first pose multimodal hallucination detection as a sequence labeling task where models must localize hallucinated text spans and present a strong baseline model. Given the high cost of human annotations for this task, we propose an approach to improve the sample efficiency of these models by creating corrupted grounding data, which we use for pre-training. Leveraging phrase grounding data, we generate hallucinations to replace grounded spans and create hallucinated text. Experiments show that pre-training on this data improves sample efficiency when fine-tuning, and that the learning signal from the grounding data plays an important role in these improvements.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 28 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2024.
Builds on
28 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Unified Hallucination Detection for Multimodal Large Language Models5 Feb
- 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedback1 Dec
- 2023OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocation29 Nov
- 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding28 Nov
- 2023Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuning26 Jun
Other references · 23
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
- 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
- 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
11 more
- 2016Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 548
- 2023Ferret: Refer and Ground Anything Anywhere at Any Granularitycited by 498
- 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 399
- 2024WARM: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Reward Modelscited by 145
- 2023LLaVA-Grounding: Grounded Visual Chat with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 113
- 2020Contrastive Learning for Weakly Supervised Phrase Groundingcited by 102
- 2022Reliable Visual Question Answering: Abstain Rather Than Answer Incorrectlycited by 86
- 2024ALOHa: A New Measure for Hallucination in Captioning Modelscited by 44
- 2023Improving Selective Visual Question Answering by Learning from Your Peerscited by 24
- 2023Simple Token-Level Confidence Improves Caption Correctnesscited by 11
- 2024Learning from Synthetic Data for Visual Groundingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Delve into Visual Contrastive Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation of Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 12
- 2025UniVRSE: Unified Vision-conditioned Response Semantic Entropy for Hallucination Detection in Medical Vision-Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026HalluScope: Fine-grained Hallucination Diagnosis for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026UniProbe: A Learnable Token-Level Hallucination Detector for Large VLMs using Multi-Structural Internal Representationscited by 0
- 2026UniProbe: A Learnable Token-Level Hallucination Detector for Large VLMs using Multi-Structural Internal Representations11 Aug 2026
- 2026HalluScope: Fine-grained Hallucination Diagnosis for Multimodal Large Language Models23 Jul 2026
- 2025UniVRSE: Unified Vision-conditioned Response Semantic Entropy for Hallucination Detection in Medical Vision-Language Models26 Mar 2025
- 2024Delve into Visual Contrastive Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation of Large Vision-Language Models9 Dec 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Scalable Token-Level Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models
- 2025Mitigating Behavioral Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Models for Sequential Images
- 2025A Survey of Multimodal Hallucination Evaluation and Detection
- 2024Beyond Logit Lens: Contextual Embeddings for Robust Hallucination Detection & Grounding in VLMs
- 2025ZINA: Multimodal Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing
- 2025HalLoc: Token-level Localization of Hallucinations for Vision Language Models
- 2023HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models
- 2024Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedback