mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating ChatGPT on Nuclear Domain-Specific Data

arXiv 2409.00090 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper examines the application of ChatGPT, a large language model (LLM), for question-and-answer (Q&A) tasks in the highly specialized field of nuclear data. The primary focus is on evaluating ChatGPT's performance on a curated test dataset, comparing the outcomes of a standalone LLM with those generated through a Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approach. LLMs, despite their recent advancements, are prone to generating incorrect or 'hallucinated' information, which is a significant limitation in applications requiring high accuracy and reliability. This study explores the potential of utilizing RAG in LLMs, a method that integrates external knowledge bases and sophisticated retrieval techniques to enhance the accuracy and relevance of generated outputs. In this context, the paper evaluates ChatGPT's ability to answer domain-specific questions, employing two methodologies: A) direct response from the LLM, and B) response from the LLM within a RAG framework. The effectiveness of these methods is assessed through a dual mechanism of human and LLM evaluation, scoring the responses for correctness and other metrics. The findings underscore the improvement in performance when incorporating a RAG pipeline in an LLM, particularly in generating more accurate and contextually appropriate responses for nuclear domain-specific queries. Additionally, the paper highlights alternative approaches to further refine and improve the quality of answers in such specialized domains.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 8 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2024.

Builds on

8 of 14 references.

References · 8

  1. 2023A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Modelscited by 365
  2. 2023Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedbackcited by 351
  3. 2023Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificitycited by 204
  4. 2023Empower Large Language Model to Perform Better on Industrial Domain-Specific Question Answeringcited by 41
  5. 2023LeanContext: Cost-Efficient Domain-Specific Question Answering Using LLMscited by 40
  6. 2023Generative AI Text Classification using Ensemble LLM Approachescited by 29
  7. 2018Practical Text Classification With Large Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 24
  8. 2020SHAP values for Explaining CNN-based Text Classification Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Comparing the Performance of LLMs in RAG-based Question-Answering: A Case Study in Computer Science Literature
  2. 2024Evaluating Students' Open-ended Written Responses with LLMs: Using the RAG Framework for GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude-3, and Mistral-Large
  3. 2023Establishing Performance Baselines in Fine-Tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Soft-Prompting for Non-Specialist LLM Users
  4. 2025Chatbot Arena Meets Nuggets: Towards Explanations and Diagnostics in the Evaluation of LLM Responses
  5. 2025On the Influence of Context Size and Model Choice in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
  6. 2026Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering over Scientific Literature for the Electron-Ion Collider
  7. 2024LLM Robustness Against Misinformation in Biomedical Question Answering
  8. 2024Adversarial Databases Improve Success in Retrieval-based Large Language Models