mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Navigating the sociotechnical labyrinth: Dynamic certification for responsible embodied AI

arXiv 2409.00015 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sociotechnical requirements shape the governance of artificially intelligent (AI) systems. In an era where embodied AI technologies are rapidly reshaping various facets of contemporary society, their inherent dynamic adaptability presents a unique blend of opportunities and challenges. Traditional regulatory mechanisms, often designed for static -- or slower-paced -- technologies, find themselves at a crossroads when faced with the fluid and evolving nature of AI systems. Moreover, typical problems in AI, for example, the frequent opacity and unpredictability of the behaviour of the systems, add additional sociotechnical challenges. To address these interconnected issues, we introduce the concept of dynamic certification, an adaptive regulatory framework specifically crafted to keep pace with the continuous evolution of AI systems. The complexity of these challenges requires common progress in multiple domains: technical, socio-governmental, and regulatory. Our proposed transdisciplinary approach is designed to ensure the safe, ethical, and practical deployment of AI systems, aligning them bidirectionally with the real-world contexts in which they operate. By doing so, we aim to bridge the gap between rapid technological advancement and effective regulatory oversight, ensuring that AI systems not only achieve their intended goals but also adhere to ethical standards and societal values.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2024.

Builds on

6 of 28 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 135
  2. 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 87
  3. 2022Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AIcited by 40
  4. 2022The Algorithmic Imprintcited by 10
  5. 2019Governance by Glass-Box: Implementing Transparent Moral Bounds for AI Behaviourcited by 6
  6. 2022Dynamic Certification for Autonomous Systemscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.