A global AI community requires language-diverse publishing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this provocation, we discuss the English dominance of the AI research community, arguing that the requirement for English language publishing upholds and reinforces broader regimes of extraction in AI. While large language models and machine translation have been celebrated as a way to break down barriers, we regard their use as a symptom of linguistic exclusion of scientists and potential readers. We propose alternative futures for a healthier publishing culture, organized around three themes: administering conferences in the languages of the country in which they are held, instructing peer reviewers not to adjudicate the language appropriateness of papers, and offering opportunities to publish and present in multiple languages. We welcome new translations of this piece. Please contact the authors if you would like to contribute one.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2024.
Builds on
2 of 11 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.