Logic interpretations of ANN partition cells
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Consider a binary classification problem solved using a feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN). Let the ANN be composed of a ReLU layer and several linear layers (convolution, sum-pooling, or fully connected). We assume the network was trained with high accuracy. Despite numerous suggested approaches, interpreting an artificial neural network remains challenging for humans. For a new method of interpretation, we construct a bridge between a simple ANN and logic. As a result, we can analyze and manipulate the semantics of an ANN using the powerful tool set of logic. To achieve this, we decompose the input space of the ANN into several network partition cells. Each network partition cell represents a linear combination that maps input values to a classifying output value. For interpreting the linear map of a partition cell using logic expressions, we suggest minterm values as the input of a simple ANN. We derive logic expressions representing interaction patterns for separating objects classified as 1 from those classified as 0. To facilitate an interpretation of logic expressions, we present them as binary logic trees.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2024.
Builds on
3 of 23 references.
References · 3
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2018Deep Neural Decision Treescited by 72
Built on by
Not cited yet.