Enhancing Few-Shot Transfer Learning with Optimized Multi-Task Prompt Tuning through Modular Prompt Composition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, multi-task prompt tuning has garnered considerable attention for its inherent modularity and potential to enhance parameter-efficient transfer learning across diverse tasks. This paper aims to analyze and improve the performance of multiple tasks by facilitating the transfer of knowledge between their corresponding prompts in a multi-task setting. Our proposed approach decomposes the prompt for each target task into a combination of shared prompts (source prompts) and a task-specific prompt (private prompt). During training, the source prompts undergo fine-tuning and are integrated with the private prompt to drive the target prompt for each task. We present and compare multiple methods for combining source prompts to construct the target prompt, analyzing the roles of both source and private prompts within each method. We investigate their contributions to task performance and offer flexible, adjustable configurations based on these insights to optimize performance. Our empirical findings clearly showcase improvements in accuracy and robustness compared to the conventional practice of prompt tuning and related works. Notably, our results substantially outperform other methods in the field in few-shot settings, demonstrating superior performance in various tasks across GLUE benchmark, among other tasks. This achievement is attained with a significantly reduced amount of training data, making our method a promising one for few-shot settings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2024.
Builds on
19 of 28 references.
References · 19
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
- 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
- 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
- 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 685
7 more
- 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 458
- 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 337
- 2020Exploring and Predicting Transferability across NLP Taskscited by 126
- 2023Multitask Prompt Tuning Enables Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 115
- 2022ATTEMPT: Parameter-Efficient Multi-task Tuning via Attentional Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 85
- 2022Multitask Vision-Language Prompt Tuningcited by 51
- 2022Multitask Pre-training of Modular Prompt for Chinese Few-Shot Learningcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.