RIFF: Inducing Rules for Fraud Detection from Decision Trees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Financial fraud is the cause of multi-billion dollar losses annually. Traditionally, fraud detection systems rely on rules due to their transparency and interpretability, key features in domains where decisions need to be explained. However, rule systems require significant input from domain experts to create and tune, an issue that rule induction algorithms attempt to mitigate by inferring rules directly from data. We explore the application of these algorithms to fraud detection, where rule systems are constrained to have a low false positive rate (FPR) or alert rate, by proposing RIFF, a rule induction algorithm that distills a low FPR rule set directly from decision trees. Our experiments show that the induced rules are often able to maintain or improve performance of the original models for low FPR tasks, while substantially reducing their complexity and outperforming rules hand-tuned by experts.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2024.
Builds on
6 of 20 references.
References · 6
- 2013Submodular Optimization with Submodular Cover and Submodular Knapsack Constraintscited by 40
- 2022Turning the Tables: Biased, Imbalanced, Dynamic Tabular Datasets for ML Evaluationcited by 39
- 2021Learning Accurate and Interpretable Decision Rule Sets from Neural Networkscited by 25
- 2022FairGBM: Gradient Boosting with Fairness Constraintscited by 25
- 2022Differentiable Rule Induction with Learned Relational Featurescited by 8
- 2020ARMS: Automated rules management system for fraud detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Graph-Based Fraud Detection with Dual-Path Graph Filtering14 Apr 2026