Estimated Audio-Caption Correspondences Improve Language-Based Audio Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dual-encoder-based audio retrieval systems are commonly optimized with contrastive learning on a set of matching and mismatching audio-caption pairs. This leads to a shared embedding space in which corresponding items from the two modalities end up close together. Since audio-caption datasets typically only contain matching pairs of recordings and descriptions, it has become common practice to create mismatching pairs by pairing the audio with a caption randomly drawn from the dataset. This is not ideal because the randomly sampled caption could, just by chance, partly or entirely describe the audio recording. However, correspondence information for all possible pairs is costly to annotate and thus typically unavailable; we, therefore, suggest substituting it with estimated correspondences. To this end, we propose a two-staged training procedure in which multiple retrieval models are first trained as usual, i.e., without estimated correspondences. In the second stage, the audio-caption correspondences predicted by these models then serve as prediction targets. We evaluate our method on the ClothoV2 and the AudioCaps benchmark and show that it improves retrieval performance, even in a restricting self-distillation setting where a single model generates and then learns from the estimated correspondences. We further show that our method outperforms the current state of the art by 1.6 pp. mAP@10 on the ClothoV2 benchmark.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2024.
Builds on
23 of 26 references.
References · 23
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2015Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Bookscited by 1,041
- 2019Clotho: An Audio Captioning Datasetcited by 354
- 2023WavCaps: A ChatGPT-Assisted Weakly-Labelled Audio Captioning Dataset for Audio-Language Multimodal Researchcited by 266
- 2021Efficient Training of Audio Transformers with Patchoutcited by 222
- 2023VAST: A Vision-Audio-Subtitle-Text Omni-Modality Foundation Model and Datasetcited by 168
- 2021Audio Retrieval with Natural Language Queries: A Benchmark Studycited by 61
11 more
- 2022On Metric Learning for Audio-Text Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 30
- 2022Efficient Large-scale Audio Tagging via Transformer-to-CNN Knowledge Distillationcited by 25
- 2023Self-supervised Audio Teacher-Student Transformer for Both Clip-level and Frame-level Taskscited by 25
- 2024Cacophony: An Improved Contrastive Audio-Text Modelcited by 18
- 2023Improving Text-Audio Retrieval by Text-aware Attention Pooling and Prior Matrix Revised Losscited by 12
- 2021Unsupervised Audio-Caption Aligning Learns Correspondences between Individual Sound Events and Textual Phrasescited by 8
- 2023Advancing Natural-Language Based Audio Retrieval with PaSST and Large Audio-Caption Data Setscited by 6
- 2023Killing two birds with one stone: Can an audio captioning system also be used for audio-text retrieval?cited by 3
- 2022Improving Natural-Language-based Audio Retrieval with Transfer Learning and Audio & Text Augmentationscited by 2
- 2024Fusing Audio and Metadata Embeddings Improves Language-based Audio Retrievalcited by 2
- 2023Crowdsourcing and Evaluating Text-Based Audio Retrieval Relevancescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.