Solving Decision Theory Problems with Probabilistic Answer Set Programming
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Solving a decision theory problem usually involves finding the actions, among a set of possible ones, which optimize the expected reward, possibly accounting for the uncertainty of the environment. In this paper, we introduce the possibility to encode decision theory problems with Probabilistic Answer Set Programming under the credal semantics via decision atoms and utility attributes. To solve the task we propose an algorithm based on three layers of Algebraic Model Counting, that we test on several synthetic datasets against an algorithm that adopts answer set enumeration. Empirical results show that our algorithm can manage non trivial instances of programs in a reasonable amount of time. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2024.
Builds on
5 of 56 references.
References · 5
- 2017Multi-shot ASP solving with clingocited by 115
- 2019ASP-Core-2 Input Language Formatcited by 77
- 2022Treewidth-aware Reductions of Normal ASP to SAT -- Is Normal ASP Harder than SAT after All?cited by 8
- 2023smProbLog: Stable Model Semantics in ProbLog for Probabilistic Argumentationcited by 6
- 2015Graph Bisection with Pareto-Optimizationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.