Liquid Fourier Latent Dynamics Networks for fast GPU-based numerical simulations in computational cardiology
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scientific Machine Learning (ML) is gaining momentum as a cost-effective alternative to physics-based numerical solvers in many engineering applications. In fact, scientific ML is currently being used to build accurate and efficient surrogate models starting from high-fidelity numerical simulations, effectively encoding the parameterized temporal dynamics underlying Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs), or even the spatio-temporal behavior underlying Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), in appropriately designed neural networks. We propose an extension of Latent Dynamics Networks (LDNets), namely Liquid Fourier LDNets (LFLDNets), to create parameterized space-time surrogate models for multiscale and multiphysics sets of highly nonlinear differential equations on complex geometries. LFLDNets employ a neurologically-inspired, sparse, liquid neural network for temporal dynamics, relaxing the requirement of a numerical solver for time advancement and leading to superior performance in terms of tunable parameters, accuracy, efficiency and learned trajectories with respect to neural ODEs based on feedforward fully-connected neural networks. Furthermore, in our implementation of LFLDNets, we use a Fourier embedding with a tunable kernel in the reconstruction network to learn high-frequency functions better and faster than using space coordinates directly as input. We challenge LFLDNets in the framework of computational cardiology and evaluate their capabilities on two 3-dimensional test cases arising from multiscale cardiac electrophysiology and cardiovascular hemodynamics. This paper illustrates the capability to run Artificial Intelligence-based numerical simulations on single or multiple GPUs in a matter of minutes and represents a significant step forward in the development of physics-informed digital twins.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2024.
Builds on
37 of 77 references.
References · 37
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
- 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 634
- 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 516
- 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 416
25 more
- 2019Augmented Neural ODEscited by 396
- 2020Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 343
- 2023GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 321
- 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 293
- 2022Transformer for Partial Differential Equations' Operator Learningcited by 270
- 2023Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Designcited by 218
- 2020Liquid Time-constant Networkscited by 160
- 2022Physics-Informed Deep Neural Operator Networkscited by 110
- 2024A comprehensive and FAIR comparison between MLP and KAN representations for differential equations and operator networkscited by 103
- 2020Multiscale Simulations of Complex Systems by Learning their Effective Dynamicscited by 86
- 2024Grokked Transformers are Implicit Reasoners: A Mechanistic Journey to the Edge of Generalizationcited by 78
- 2021Closed-form Continuous-time Neural Modelscited by 65
- 2024Neural Operators with Localized Integral and Differential Kernelscited by 59
- 2024Pretraining Codomain Attention Neural Operators for Solving Multiphysics PDEscited by 58
- 2022Multifidelity Deep Operator Networks For Data-Driven and Physics-Informed Problemscited by 57
- 2023Sequential Deep Operator Networks (S-DeepONet) for Predicting Full-field Solutions Under Time-dependent Loadscited by 47
- 2021Causal Navigation by Continuous-time Neural Networkscited by 23
- 2024The Empirical Impact of Neural Parameter Symmetries, or Lack Thereofcited by 21
- 2023Learning Reduced-Order Models for Cardiovascular Simulations with Graph Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2023SDF4CHD: Generative Modeling of Cardiac Anatomies with Congenital Heart Defectscited by 17
- 2023Shape of my heart: Cardiac models through learned signed distance functionscited by 10
- 2022A comprehensive and biophysically detailed computational model of the whole human heart electromechanicscited by 8
- 2021Modeling cardiac muscle fibers in ventricular and atrial electrophysiology simulationscited by 6
- 2021On the periodicity of cardiovascular fluid dynamics simulationscited by 5
- 2023Branched Latent Neural Mapscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.
- 2024LD-EnSF: Synergizing Latent Dynamics with Ensemble Score Filters for Fast Data Assimilation with Sparse Observationscited by 10
- 2025Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineeringcited by 4
- 2025Full-field surrogate modeling of cardiac function encoding geometric variabilitycited by 3
- 2025Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering6 Oct 2025
- 2025Full-field surrogate modeling of cardiac function encoding geometric variability29 Apr 2025
- 2024LD-EnSF: Synergizing Latent Dynamics with Ensemble Score Filters for Fast Data Assimilation with Sparse Observations28 Nov 2024