mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Linking Robustness and Generalization: A k* Distribution Analysis of Concept Clustering in Latent Space for Vision Models

arXiv 2408.09065 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most evaluations of vision models use indirect methods to assess latent space quality. These methods often involve adding extra layers to project the latent space into a new one. This projection makes it difficult to analyze and compare the original latent space. This article uses the k* Distribution, a local neighborhood analysis method, to examine the learned latent space at the level of individual concepts, which can be extended to examine the entire latent space. We introduce skewness-based true and approximate metrics for interpreting individual concepts to assess the overall quality of vision models' latent space. Our findings indicate that current vision models frequently fracture the distributions of individual concepts within the latent space. Nevertheless, as these models improve in generalization across multiple datasets, the degree of fracturing diminishes. A similar trend is observed in robust vision models, where increased robustness correlates with reduced fracturing. Ultimately, this approach enables a direct interpretation and comparison of the latent spaces of different vision models and reveals a relationship between a model's generalizability and robustness. Results show that as a model becomes more general and robust, it tends to learn features that result in better clustering of concepts. Project Website is available online at https://shashankkotyan.github.io/k-Distribution/

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2024.

Builds on

22 of 40 references.

References · 22

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  4. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  5. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  6. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  7. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  8. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  9. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  10. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  11. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
  12. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
10 more
  1. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 791
  2. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  3. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  4. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  5. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 420
  6. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
  7. 2014Understanding Deep Image Representations by Inverting Themcited by 399
  8. 2022ELEVATER: A Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Language-Augmented Visual Modelscited by 141
  9. 2019Embedding Comparator: Visualizing Differences in Global Structure and Local Neighborhoods via Small Multiplescited by 38
  10. 2023k* Distribution: Evaluating the Latent Space of Deep Neural Networks using Local Neighborhood Analysiscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.