mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Effective Authorship Attribution: Integrating Class-Incremental Learning

arXiv 2408.08900 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2024cs.IR cs.DLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AA is the process of attributing an unidentified document to its true author from a predefined group of known candidates, each possessing multiple samples. The nature of AA necessitates accommodating emerging new authors, as each individual must be considered unique. This uniqueness can be attributed to various factors, including their stylistic preferences, areas of expertise, gender, cultural background, and other personal characteristics that influence their writing. These diverse attributes contribute to the distinctiveness of each author, making it essential for AA systems to recognize and account for these variations. However, current AA benchmarks commonly overlook this uniqueness and frame the problem as a closed-world classification, assuming a fixed number of authors throughout the system's lifespan and neglecting the inclusion of emerging new authors. This oversight renders the majority of existing approaches ineffective for real-world applications of AA, where continuous learning is essential. These inefficiencies manifest as current models either resist learning new authors or experience catastrophic forgetting, where the introduction of new data causes the models to lose previously acquired knowledge. To address these inefficiencies, we propose redefining AA as CIL, where new authors are introduced incrementally after the initial training phase, allowing the system to adapt and learn continuously. To achieve this, we briefly examine subsequent CIL approaches introduced in other domains. Moreover, we have adopted several well-known CIL methods, along with an examination of their strengths and weaknesses in the context of AA. Additionally, we outline potential future directions for advancing CIL AA systems. As a result, our paper can serve as a starting point for evolving AA systems from closed-world models to continual learning through CIL paradigms.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024A Bayesian Approach to Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Authorship Attribution
  2. 2026Where Does Authorship Signal Emerge in Encoder-Based Language Models?
  3. 2026Predicting Steering Vectors and Adapter Weights for Few-Shot Author-Style Transfer
  4. 2025Improving RAG for Personalization with Author Features and Contrastive Examples
  5. 2024Evaluation of Attribution Bias in Generator-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
  6. 2026Can Activation Steering Capture Multidimensional Authorship Style?
  7. 2026Self-Generated Text Recognition: Quality Heuristics, Cross-Task Transfer, and Downstream Bias in LLM Evaluation
  8. 2025Personalized Image Generation from an Author Writing Style