mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MIA-Tuner: Adapting Large Language Models as Pre-training Text Detector

arXiv 2408.08661 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2024cs.CL cs.CR cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing parameters and expansive dataset of large language models (LLMs) highlight the urgent demand for a technical solution to audit the underlying privacy risks and copyright issues associated with LLMs. Existing studies have partially addressed this need through an exploration of the pre-training data detection problem, which is an instance of a membership inference attack (MIA). This problem involves determining whether a given piece of text has been used during the pre-training phase of the target LLM. Although existing methods have designed various sophisticated MIA score functions to achieve considerable detection performance in pre-trained LLMs, how to achieve high-confidence detection and how to perform MIA on aligned LLMs remain challenging. In this paper, we propose MIA-Tuner, a novel instruction-based MIA method, which instructs LLMs themselves to serve as a more precise pre-training data detector internally, rather than design an external MIA score function. Furthermore, we design two instruction-based safeguards to respectively mitigate the privacy risks brought by the existing methods and MIA-Tuner. To comprehensively evaluate the most recent state-of-the-art LLMs, we collect a more up-to-date MIA benchmark dataset, named WIKIMIA-24, to replace the widely adopted benchmark WIKIMIA. We conduct extensive experiments across various aligned and unaligned LLMs over the two benchmark datasets. The results demonstrate that MIA-Tuner increases the AUC of MIAs from 0.7 to a significantly high level of 0.9.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2024.

Builds on

30 of 43 references.

References · 30

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  6. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  8. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  9. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  10. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  11. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  12. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
18 more
  1. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
  2. 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 923
  3. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
  4. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  5. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
  6. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
  7. 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 371
  8. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Surveycited by 241
  9. 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 227
  10. 2023Speak, Memory: An Archaeology of Books Known to ChatGPT/GPT-4cited by 123
  11. 2023Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibrationcited by 90
  12. 2023Controlling the Extraction of Memorized Data from Large Language Models via Prompt-Tuningcited by 40
  13. 2023Ethicist: Targeted Training Data Extraction Through Loss Smoothed Soft Prompting and Calibrated Confidence Estimationcited by 36
  14. 2024Instruction Fine-Tuning: Does Prompt Loss Matter?cited by 26
  15. 2023Investigating Forgetting in Pre-Trained Representations Through Continual Learningcited by 19
  16. 2023A Probabilistic Fluctuation based Membership Inference Attack for Diffusion Modelscited by 17
  17. 2022Debiasing Learning for Membership Inference Attacks Against Recommender Systemscited by 9
  18. 2023Establishing Performance Baselines in Fine-Tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Soft-Prompting for Non-Specialist LLM Userscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 5.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: