A theory of understanding for artificial intelligence: composability, catalysts, and learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding is a crucial yet elusive concept in artificial intelligence (AI). This work proposes a framework for analyzing understanding based on the notion of composability. Given any subject (e.g., a person or an AI), we suggest characterizing its understanding of an object in terms of its ability to process (compose) relevant inputs into satisfactory outputs from the perspective of a verifier. This highly universal framework can readily apply to non-human subjects, such as AIs, non-human animals, and institutions. Further, we propose methods for analyzing the inputs that enhance output quality in compositions, which we call catalysts. We show how the structure of a subject can be revealed by analyzing its components that act as catalysts and argue that a subject's learning ability can be regarded as its ability to compose inputs into its inner catalysts. Finally we examine the importance of learning ability for AIs to attain general intelligence. Our analysis indicates that models capable of generating outputs that can function as their own catalysts, such as language models, establish a foundation for potentially overcoming existing limitations in AI understanding.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2024.
Builds on
28 of 55 references.
References · 28
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
16 more
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
- 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 820
- 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Modelscited by 551
- 2024RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrievalcited by 519
- 2023MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Actioncited by 511
- 2023Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunitiescited by 367
- 2024Long-context LLMs Struggle with Long In-context Learningcited by 285
- 2021ERNIE 3.0: Large-scale Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generationcited by 258
- 2023Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Taskscited by 243
- 2023OpenAGI: When LLM Meets Domain Expertscited by 196
- 2023Walking Down the Memory Maze: Beyond Context Limit through Interactive Readingcited by 129
- 2022On scientific understanding with artificial intelligencecited by 68
- 2023Detecting Edit Failures In Large Language Models: An Improved Specificity Benchmarkcited by 62
- 2019Ablation Studies in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 58
- 2023Understanding Natural Language Understanding Systems. A Critical Analysiscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.