From Clicks to Carbon: The Environmental Toll of Recommender Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As global warming soars, the need to assess the environmental impact of research is becoming increasingly urgent. Despite this, few recommender systems research papers address their environmental impact. In this study, we estimate the environmental impact of recommender systems research by reproducing typical experimental pipelines. Our analysis spans 79 full papers from the 2013 and 2023 ACM RecSys conferences, comparing traditional "good old-fashioned AI" algorithms with modern deep learning algorithms. We designed and reproduced representative experimental pipelines for both years, measuring energy consumption with a hardware energy meter and converting it to CO2 equivalents. Our results show that papers using deep learning algorithms emit approximately 42 times more CO2 equivalents than papers using traditional methods. On average, a single deep learning-based paper generates 3,297 kilograms of CO2 equivalents - more than the carbon emissions of one person flying from New York City to Melbourne or the amount of CO2 one tree sequesters over 300 years.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2025Do LLMs Memorize Recommendation Datasets? A Preliminary Study on MovieLens-1Mcited by 12
- 2025What do Large Language Models Say About Animals? Investigating Risks of Animal Harm in Generated Textcited by 9
- 2024Green Recommender Systems: Optimizing Dataset Size for Energy-Efficient Algorithm Performancecited by 4
- 2024Recommender Systems for Good (RS4Good): Survey of Use Cases and a Call to Action for Research that Matterscited by 2
- 2024e-Fold Cross-Validation for Recommender-System Evaluationcited by 2
- 2025One Search Fits All: Pareto-Optimal Eco-Friendly Model Selectioncited by 1
- 2025We're Still Doing It (All) Wrong: Recommender Systems, Fifteen Years Latercited by 1
- 2024From Theory to Practice: Implementing and Evaluating e-Fold Cross-Validationcited by 0
- 2025Involution-Infused DenseNet with Two-Step Compression for Resource-Efficient Plant Disease Classificationcited by 0
- 2026The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data for Recommender Systemscited by 0
- 2026Ensembles at Any Cost? Accuracy-Energy Trade-offs in Recommender Systemscited by 0
- 2026Ensembles at Any Cost? Accuracy-Energy Trade-offs in Recommender Systems9 Apr 2026
- 2026The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data for Recommender Systems7 Apr 2026
- 2025We're Still Doing It (All) Wrong: Recommender Systems, Fifteen Years Later11 Sep 2025
- 2025Involution-Infused DenseNet with Two-Step Compression for Resource-Efficient Plant Disease Classification31 May 2025
- 2025Do LLMs Memorize Recommendation Datasets? A Preliminary Study on MovieLens-1M15 May 2025
- 2025One Search Fits All: Pareto-Optimal Eco-Friendly Model Selection2 May 2025
- 2025What do Large Language Models Say About Animals? Investigating Risks of Animal Harm in Generated Text3 Mar 2025
- 2024e-Fold Cross-Validation for Recommender-System Evaluation2 Dec 2024
- 2024Recommender Systems for Good (RS4Good): Survey of Use Cases and a Call to Action for Research that Matters25 Nov 2024
- 2024From Theory to Practice: Implementing and Evaluating e-Fold Cross-Validation12 Oct 2024
- 2024Green Recommender Systems: Optimizing Dataset Size for Energy-Efficient Algorithm Performance12 Oct 2024