Mamba Retriever: Utilizing Mamba for Effective and Efficient Dense Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the information retrieval (IR) area, dense retrieval (DR) models use deep learning techniques to encode queries and passages into embedding space to compute their semantic relations. It is important for DR models to balance both efficiency and effectiveness. Pre-trained language models (PLMs), especially Transformer-based PLMs, have been proven to be effective encoders of DR models. However, the self-attention component in Transformer-based PLM results in a computational complexity that grows quadratically with sequence length, and thus exhibits a slow inference speed for long-text retrieval. Some recently proposed non-Transformer PLMs, especially the Mamba architecture PLMs, have demonstrated not only comparable effectiveness to Transformer-based PLMs on generative language tasks but also better efficiency due to linear time scaling in sequence length. This paper implements the Mamba Retriever to explore whether Mamba can serve as an effective and efficient encoder of DR model for IR tasks. We fine-tune the Mamba Retriever on the classic short-text MS MARCO passage ranking dataset and the long-text LoCoV0 dataset. Experimental results show that (1) on the MS MARCO passage ranking dataset and BEIR, the Mamba Retriever achieves comparable or better effectiveness compared to Transformer-based retrieval models, and the effectiveness grows with the size of the Mamba model; (2) on the long-text LoCoV0 dataset, the Mamba Retriever can extend to longer text length than its pre-trained length after fine-tuning on retrieval task, and it has comparable or better effectiveness compared to other long-text retrieval models; (3) the Mamba Retriever has superior inference speed for long-text retrieval. In conclusion, Mamba Retriever is both effective and efficient, making it a practical model, especially for long-text retrieval.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024State Space Models are Strong Text Rerankerscited by 10
- 2025Single-Pass Document Scanning for Question Answeringcited by 6
- 2025Distillation versus Contrastive Learning: How to Train Your Rerankerscited by 6
- 2024RARe: Retrieval Augmented Retrieval with In-Context Examplescited by 2
- 2025Studying the Soupability of Documents in State Space Modelscited by 1
- 2025Scaling Legal AI: Benchmarking Mamba and Transformers for Statutory Classification and Case Law Retrievalcited by 1
- 2026Frequency-Enhanced Hilbert Scanning Mamba for Short-Term Arctic Sea Ice Concentration Predictioncited by 0
- 2026Linear-Time and Constant-Memory Text Embeddings Based on Recurrent Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Linear-Time and Constant-Memory Text Embeddings Based on Recurrent Language Models20 Apr 2026
- 2026Frequency-Enhanced Hilbert Scanning Mamba for Short-Term Arctic Sea Ice Concentration Prediction13 Feb 2026
- 2025Scaling Legal AI: Benchmarking Mamba and Transformers for Statutory Classification and Case Law Retrieval29 Aug 2025
- 2025Distillation versus Contrastive Learning: How to Train Your Rerankers11 Jul 2025
- 2025Studying the Soupability of Documents in State Space Models29 May 2025
- 2025Single-Pass Document Scanning for Question Answering4 Apr 2025
- 2024State Space Models are Strong Text Rerankers18 Dec 2024
- 2024RARe: Retrieval Augmented Retrieval with In-Context Examples26 Oct 2024