The Complexity of Manipulation of k-Coalitional Games on Graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many settings, there is an organizer who would like to divide a set of agents into k coalitions, and cares about the friendships within each coalition. Specifically, the organizer might want to maximize utilitarian social welfare, maximize egalitarian social welfare, or simply guarantee that every agent will have at least one friend within his coalition. However, in many situations, the organizer is not familiar with the friendship connections, and he needs to obtain them from the agents. In this setting, a manipulative agent may falsely report friendship connections in order to increase his utility. In this paper, we analyze the complexity of finding manipulation in such k-coalitional games on graphs. We also introduce a new type of manipulation, socially-aware manipulation, in which the manipulator would like to increase his utility without decreasing the social welfare. We then study the complexity of finding socially-aware manipulation in our setting. Finally, we examine the frequency of socially-aware manipulation and the running time of our algorithms via simulation results.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2024.
Builds on
6 of 25 references.
References · 6
- 2022Hedonic Games and Treewidth Revisitedcited by 3
- 2015Mechanism Design for Team Formationcited by 1
- 2018Degree-constrained 2-partitions of graphscited by 1
- 2019The Number of Minimum k-Cuts: Improving the Karger-Stein Boundcited by 1
- 2020Finding All Global Minimum Cuts In Practicecited by 1
- 2021Manipulation of k-Coalitional Games on Social Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.