VERCATION: Precise Vulnerable Open-source Software Version Identification based on Static Analysis and LLM
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Open-source software (OSS) has experienced a surge in popularity, attributed to its collaborative development model and cost-effective nature. However, the adoption of specific software versions in development projects may introduce security risks when these versions bring along vulnerabilities. Current methods of identifying vulnerable versions typically analyze and extract the code features involved in vulnerability patches using static analysis with pre-defined rules. They then use code clone detection to identify the vulnerable versions. These methods are hindered by imprecision due to (1) the exclusion of vulnerability-irrelevant code in the analysis and (2) the inadequacy of code clone detection. This paper presents VERCATION, an approach designed to identify vulnerable versions of OSS written in C/C++. VERCATION combines program slicing with a Large Language Model (LLM) to identify vulnerability-relevant code from vulnerability patches. It then backtracks historical commits to gather previous modifications of identified vulnerability-relevant code. We propose code clone detection based on expanded and normalized ASTs to compare the differences between pre-modification and post-modification code, thereby locating the vulnerability-introducing commit (vic) and enabling the identification of the vulnerable versions between the vulnerability-fixing commit and the vic. We curate a dataset linking 122 OSS vulnerabilities and 1,211 versions to evaluate VERCATION. On this dataset, our approach achieves an F1 score of 93.1%, outperforming current state-of-the-art methods. More importantly, VERCATION detected 202 incorrect vulnerable OSS versions in NVD reports.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025A Contemporary Survey of Large Language Model Assisted Program Analysiscited by 11
- 2024Multi-Programming Language Sandbox for LLMscited by 10
- 2024LProtector: An LLM-driven Vulnerability Detection Systemcited by 8
- 2026Sifting the Noise: A Comparative Study of LLM Agents in Vulnerability False Positive Filteringcited by 5
- 2026FlowArk: Boosting Agentic Data-flow Analysis for Android Apps via Context-Aware Knowledge Reusecited by 0
- 2026VICBench: A Multi-Language Benchmark for Code Vulnerability Detectioncited by 0
- 2026VICBench: A Multi-Language Benchmark for Code Vulnerability Detection12 Aug 2026
- 2026FlowArk: Boosting Agentic Data-flow Analysis for Android Apps via Context-Aware Knowledge Reuse13 Jul 2026
- 2026Sifting the Noise: A Comparative Study of LLM Agents in Vulnerability False Positive Filtering30 Jan 2026
- 2025A Contemporary Survey of Large Language Model Assisted Program Analysis5 Feb 2025
- 2024LProtector: An LLM-driven Vulnerability Detection System10 Nov 2024
- 2024Multi-Programming Language Sandbox for LLMs30 Oct 2024